[cfe-commits] r155691 - /cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c

[NAKAMURA Takumi]

Chandler, thank you to notify me.

I have marked it as XFAIL for now.

As you say, it would not make sense. It would be worse since "gcc
-f(no-)math-errno %.s" is passed to gcc-as.


...Takumi


2012/4/27 Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:36 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Author: chapuni
>> Date: Thu Apr 26 23:36:27 2012
>> New Revision: 155691
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=155691&view=rev
>> Log:
>> test/Driver/fast-math.c: Mark this as XFAIL:cygming. They use gcc driver
>> for as.
>
>
> XFAILing the whole thing doesn't make sense though. Most of this test is
> checking the interactions of the Clang driver and CC1... What is the actual
> problem here?
>
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>>    cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c
>>
>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c
>> URL:
>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c?rev=155691&r1=155690&r2=155691&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c (original)
>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c Thu Apr 26 23:36:27 2012
>> @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
>>  // LLVM only supports three switches which is more coarse grained than
>> GCC's
>>  // support.
>>  //
>> +// Both of them use gcc driver for as.
>> +// XFAIL: cygwin,mingw32
>> +//
>>  // RUN: %clang -### -fno-honor-infinities -c %s 2>&1 \
>>  // RUN:   | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-INFS %s
>>  // CHECK-NO-INFS: "-cc1"
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>