[cfe-commits] r154776 - in /cfe/trunk/test: Analysis/objc-bool.m Headers/typedef_guards.c Lexer/utf-16.c Preprocessor/pragma_sysheader.c Sema/surpress-deprecated.c SemaCXX/warn-everthing.cpp

Matthieu Monrocq matthieu.monrocq at gmail.com
Mon Apr 16 10:29:55 PDT 2012


Le 16 avril 2012 00:09, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Author: dblaikie
> Date: Sun Apr 15 17:09:44 2012
> New Revision: 154776
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=154776&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix tests that weren't actually verifying anything.
>
> Passing -verify to clang without -cc1 or -Xclang silently passes (with a
> printed warning, but lit doesn't care about that). This change adds -cc1
> or,
> as is necessary in one case, -Xclang to fix this so that these tests are
> actually verifying as intended.
>
> I'd like to change the driver so this kind of mistake could not be made,
> but
> I'm not entirely sure how. Further, since the driver only warns about
> unknown
> flags in general, we could have similar bugs with a misspellings of
> arguments
> that would be nice to find.
>
> Modified:
>    cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/objc-bool.m
>    cfe/trunk/test/Headers/typedef_guards.c
>    cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/utf-16.c
>    cfe/trunk/test/Preprocessor/pragma_sysheader.c
>    cfe/trunk/test/Sema/surpress-deprecated.c
>    cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-everthing.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/objc-bool.m
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/objc-bool.m?rev=154776&r1=154775&r2=154776&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/objc-bool.m (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Analysis/objc-bool.m Sun Apr 15 17:09:44 2012
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// RUN: %clang --analyze %s -o %t -verify
> +// RUN: %clang --analyze %s -o %t -Xclang -verify
>
>  // Test handling of ObjC bool literals.
>
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Headers/typedef_guards.c
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Headers/typedef_guards.c?rev=154776&r1=154775&r2=154776&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Headers/typedef_guards.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Headers/typedef_guards.c Sun Apr 15 17:09:44 2012
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -verify %s
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
>
>  // NULL is rdefined in stddef.h
>  #define NULL ((void*) 0)
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/utf-16.c
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/utf-16.c?rev=154776&r1=154775&r2=154776&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/utf-16.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/utf-16.c Sun Apr 15 17:09:44 2012
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// RUN: not %clang %s -fsyntax-only -verify
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify
>  // rdar://7876588
>
>  // This test verifies that clang gives a decent error for UTF-16 source
> files.
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Preprocessor/pragma_sysheader.c
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Preprocessor/pragma_sysheader.c?rev=154776&r1=154775&r2=154776&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Preprocessor/pragma_sysheader.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Preprocessor/pragma_sysheader.c Sun Apr 15 17:09:44 2012
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// RUN: %clang -verify -pedantic %s -fsyntax-only
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -pedantic %s -fsyntax-only
>  // RUN: %clang_cc1 -E %s | FileCheck %s
>  // rdar://6899937
>  #include "pragma_sysheader.h"
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/surpress-deprecated.c
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/surpress-deprecated.c?rev=154776&r1=154775&r2=154776&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/surpress-deprecated.c (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/surpress-deprecated.c Sun Apr 15 17:09:44 2012
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -Wno-deprecated-declarations -verify %s
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wno-deprecated-declarations -verify %s
>  extern void OldFunction() __attribute__((deprecated));
>
>  int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) {
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-everthing.cpp
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-everthing.cpp?rev=154776&r1=154775&r2=154776&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-everthing.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/warn-everthing.cpp Sun Apr 15 17:09:44 2012
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// RUN: %clang -Weverything -fsyntax-only %s -verify
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -Weverything -fsyntax-only %s -verify
>
>  // This previously crashed due to a bug in the CFG.  Exercising all
>  // warnings helps check CFG construction.
> @@ -8,6 +8,6 @@
>   ~PR12271();
>  };
>
> -void testPR12271() {
> -  PR12271 a[1][1];
> -}
> \ No newline at end of file
> +void testPR12271() { // expected-warning {{no previous prototype for
> function 'testPR12271'}}
> +  PR12271 a[1][1]; // expected-warning {{unused variable 'a'}}
> +}
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>

The only way I would see lit actually reacting would be to terminate the
processus with a non-0 result, which should be reported.

Perhaps that we could add a "developer" option provoking this kind of
behavior for unknown flags and have lit expand %clang and %clang_cc1
automatically with this flag. This flag should then be negated in the few
tests that actually test the driver diagnostic.

-- Matthieu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120416/b77753a3/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list