[cfe-commits] [patch] decltype in mem-initializers

[David Blaikie]

Bump. It's really not a terribly big patch or anything... honest.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:42 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
> Bump again (patch sync'd/updated, though there weren't any conflicts)
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:02 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Bump and... hey, why not attach the patch.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:48 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Another small/simple patch to add support for decltype in
>>> mem-initializers such as this:
>>>
>>> struct Base { Base(int); };
>>> struct Derived : Base {
>>>  Derived() : decltype(Base(1))(3) { // initializing base
>>>  }
>>>  Derived(int) : decltype(Derived())() { // forwarding ctor
>>>  }
>>> };
>>>
>>> Thanks again,
>>> - David
>>>
>>> [After this & the other patch I have out I should only have pseudo
>>> destructors left before we've finished N3031 (minor niggling leftover
>>> is that I need to go back & preclude the use of decltype in
>>> nested-name-specifiers that are used in declarator-ids, strangely -
>>> 8.3\1)]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pr10127-base-init.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7885 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20120121/8f13362e/attachment.diff>