[cfe-commits] r140546 - /cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
Sebastian Redl
sebastian.redl at getdesigned.at
Mon Sep 26 14:25:06 PDT 2011
On 26.09.2011, at 20:53, Eli Friedman wrote:
> Author: efriedma
> Date: Mon Sep 26 13:53:43 2011
> New Revision: 140546
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=140546&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix a typo in the new VerifyOnly handling in SemaInit. No visible difference at the moment, as far as I can tell.
>
>
> Modified:
> cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
>
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp?rev=140546&r1=140545&r2=140546&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp Mon Sep 26 13:53:43 2011
> @@ -1878,7 +1878,7 @@
> = DesignatedEndIndex.extOrTrunc(MaxElements.getBitWidth());
> DesignatedEndIndex.setIsUnsigned(MaxElements.isUnsigned());
> if (DesignatedEndIndex >= MaxElements) {
> - if (VerifyOnly)
> + if (!VerifyOnly)
> SemaRef.Diag(IndexExpr->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
> diag::err_array_designator_too_large)
> << DesignatedEndIndex.toString(10) << MaxElements.toString(10)
No indeed - in fact, no error in this area will surface until I implement overload resolution for initializer list arguments.
Still, thank you for the catch.
Sebastian
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list