[cfe-commits] exclusive locks required at function boundaries

Caitlin Sadowski supertri at google.com
Tue Sep 13 18:35:30 PDT 2011


Here is a first patch that refactors how errors are reported for
situations where there is inconisitency between locks:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4964080

Building off of that, here is a patch that deals with locks required
attributes at function boundaries:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4995046

Building off of that, here is a patch that refactors how locks are
added in preparation for the next patch in the series:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5001042

Building off of that, here is a patch that eliminates spurious
warnings inside of lock functions:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5006043

Cheers,

Caitlin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1locksrequired-refactor.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 16029 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20110913/16797a35/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2locksrequired.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4279 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20110913/16797a35/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 4locksrequired-noanalfun.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 24907 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20110913/16797a35/attachment-0002.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 3locksrequired-refactor.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 15749 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20110913/16797a35/attachment-0003.bin>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list