[cfe-commits] [PATCH][Review request]Support for c++0x nullptr in static analyzer
Joerg Sonnenberger
joerg at britannica.bec.de
Wed Apr 20 16:47:35 PDT 2011
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 03:52:55PM -0700, Jim Goodnow II wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> Yes, we do. The real purpose of the nullptr is the last part of the test
> program where it allows you to distinguish between two overloaded
> functions, i.e.:
>
> void func( int );
> void func( int *);
I don't see how it matters here. But what about classic variadic
functions? nullptr is a valid sentinal for execl, NULL isn't.
Joerg
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list