[cfe-commits] [libcxx] r128797 - in /libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative: map/map.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp multimap/multimap.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp multiset/multiset.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp set/set.cons/default_recurs

Howard Hinnant hhinnant at apple.com
Sun Apr 3 18:47:27 PDT 2011


On Apr 3, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 3, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Howard Hinnant <hhinnant at apple.com> wrote:
>>>> Author: hhinnant
>>>> Date: Sun Apr  3 15:06:31 2011
>>>> New Revision: 128797
>>>> 
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=128797&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> ... And these wonderful tests.
>>>> 
>>>> Added:
>>>>    libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/map/map.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp
>>>>    libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp
>>>>    libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/multiset/multiset.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp
>>>>    libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/set/set.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp
>>>> 
>>>> Added: libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/map/map.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/map/map.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp?rev=128797&view=auto
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/map/map.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp (added)
>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/test/containers/associative/map/map.cons/default_recursive.pass.cpp Sun Apr  3 15:06:31 2011
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>>>> +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
>>>> +//
>>>> +//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
>>>> +//
>>>> +// This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
>>>> +// Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
>>>> +//
>>>> +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
>>>> +
>>>> +// <map>
>>>> +
>>>> +// class map
>>>> +
>>>> +// map();
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <map>
>>>> +#include <cassert>
>>>> +
>>>> +int main()
>>>> +{
>>>> +    std::map<std::map<int,double>, std::map<int, double> > m;
>>>> +    assert(m.empty());
>>>> +    assert(m.begin() == m.end());
>>>> +}
>>> 
>>> This is supposed to be a test for r128796?  I don't see how this is
>>> related, and I can't imagine an implementation where this test
>>> wouldn't work.
>> 
>> Agreed that this test passes without applying the patch to __tree.  However I'm inclined to leave it in just because it might catch some unforeseen problem in the future.
> 
> In that case, you might want to add a test that actually tests r128796. :)

Completely agreed, thank you.  Committed revision 128807.

-Howard




More information about the cfe-commits mailing list