[cfe-commits] r127002 - /cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp

Abramo Bagnara abramo.bagnara at gmail.com
Fri Mar 4 09:20:30 PST 2011


Author: abramo
Date: Fri Mar  4 11:20:30 2011
New Revision: 127002

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=127002&view=rev
Log:
Fixed source range for function template specializations.

template <class T> void foo();
template <> void foo<int>(); /* Spec 1 */
template <> void foo<int>(); /* Spec 2 */

If we look at the main location of the first explicit specialization (Spec 1) it can be seen that it points to the name of the *second* explicit specialization (Spec 2), which is a redeclaration of Spec1.
Hence, the source range obtained for Spec1 is not only inaccurate, but also invalid (the end location comes before the start location).


Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp?rev=127002&r1=127001&r2=127002&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp Fri Mar  4 11:20:30 2011
@@ -5065,7 +5065,17 @@
 
   // Ignore access information;  it doesn't figure into redeclaration checking.
   FunctionDecl *Specialization = cast<FunctionDecl>(*Result);
-  Specialization->setLocation(FD->getLocation());
+
+  FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo *SpecInfo
+    = Specialization->getTemplateSpecializationInfo();
+  assert(SpecInfo && "Function template specialization info missing?");
+  {
+    // Note: do not overwrite location info if previous template
+    // specialization kind was explicit.
+    TemplateSpecializationKind TSK = SpecInfo->getTemplateSpecializationKind();
+    if (TSK == TSK_Undeclared || TSK == TSK_ImplicitInstantiation)
+      Specialization->setLocation(FD->getLocation());
+  }
 
   // FIXME: Check if the prior specialization has a point of instantiation.
   // If so, we have run afoul of .
@@ -5088,10 +5098,6 @@
   //   before the first use of that specialization that would cause an implicit
   //   instantiation to take place, in every translation unit in which such a
   //   use occurs; no diagnostic is required.
-  FunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo *SpecInfo
-    = Specialization->getTemplateSpecializationInfo();
-  assert(SpecInfo && "Function template specialization info missing?");
-
   bool HasNoEffect = false;
   if (!isFriend &&
       CheckSpecializationInstantiationRedecl(FD->getLocation(),





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list