[cfe-commits] [PATCH review request] unused overloaded expression should error
Douglas Gregor
dgregor at apple.com
Mon Feb 21 09:58:14 PST 2011
On Feb 20, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Faisal Vali wrote:
> This patch is peripherally related to my previous patch regarding bug 7505.
>
>
> I stumbled upon the following test code, that should error, but doesn't.
>
> void two() { }
> void two(int) { }
>
> int main()
> {
> two; // clang emits unused variable warning, but this should be an error -
> }
>
> The attached patch ensures that clang produces an error.
>
> Would appreciate any feedback :)
> thanks!
A few nits:
+ if (FullExpr->getType() == Context.OverloadTy) {
+ if (!ResolveSingleFunctionTemplateSpecialization(FullExpr,
+ /* Complain */ false))
+ {
Please line up with " /* Complain */false" with "FullExpr", as we usually do in the LLVM/Clang code base.
Also, {'s usually go on the end of the line (rather than on a new line).
Finally, I suggest that this check go after the DiagnoseUnexpandedParameterPack() call.
- Doug
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list