[cfe-commits] A regression on parsing of partial specializations?

[Douglas Gregor]

On Jan 5, 2011, at 2:05 PM, Enea Zaffanella wrote:

> After upgrading clang to r122900, the following program (from gcc
> testsuite) is no longer parsed by clang:
> 
> struct B { int i; };
> 
> template <class _T, class _M, _M _T::* _V> struct A;
> 
> template <class _T, int _T::* _V>
> struct A<_T, int, _V> {};
> 
> int main() {
>  A<B, int, & B::i> a;
> }
> 
> 
> llvm/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only bug.cc
> clang: SemaTemplate.cpp:3549: clang::ExprResult
> clang::Sema::BuildExpressionFromDeclTemplateArgument(const
> clang::TemplateArgument&, clang::QualType, clang::SourceLocation):
> Assertion `!RefExpr.isInvalid() && Context.hasSameType(((Expr*)
> RefExpr.get())->getType(), ParamType.getUnqualifiedType())' failed.

It's working for me... I may have fixed it in r122902.

	- Doug