[cfe-commits] r121505 - /cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp

[jahanian]

None of these are needed. Are you working around a gcc bug?

- Fariborz

On Dec 10, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:

> Author: dgregor
> Date: Fri Dec 10 13:28:19 2010
> New Revision: 121505
> 
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=121505&view=rev
> Log:
> Silence a few more uninitialized-value warnings
> 
> Modified:
>    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
> 
> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp?rev=121505&r1=121504&r2=121505&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp Fri Dec 10 13:28:19 2010
> @@ -3449,14 +3449,15 @@
>   }
> 
>   FunctionDecl *NewFD;
> -  bool isFriend, isVirtual, isExplicit, isVirtualOkay;
>   bool isInline = D.getDeclSpec().isInlineSpecified();
> +  bool isFriend = false;
>   DeclSpec::SCS SCSpec = D.getDeclSpec().getStorageClassSpecAsWritten();
>   FunctionDecl::StorageClass SCAsWritten
>     = StorageClassSpecToFunctionDeclStorageClass(SCSpec);
> -  FunctionTemplateDecl *FunctionTemplate;
> -  bool isExplicitSpecialization, isFunctionTemplateSpecialization;
> -  unsigned NumMatchedTemplateParamLists;
> +  FunctionTemplateDecl *FunctionTemplate = 0;
> +  bool isExplicitSpecialization = false;
> +  bool isFunctionTemplateSpecialization = false;
> +  unsigned NumMatchedTemplateParamLists = 0;
> 
>   if (!getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
>     // Determine whether the function was written with a
> @@ -3480,9 +3481,9 @@
>     FilterLookupForScope(*this, Previous, DC, S, NewFD->hasLinkage());
>   } else {
>     isFriend = D.getDeclSpec().isFriendSpecified();
> -    isVirtual = D.getDeclSpec().isVirtualSpecified();
> -    isExplicit = D.getDeclSpec().isExplicitSpecified();
> -    isVirtualOkay = false;
> +    bool isVirtual = D.getDeclSpec().isVirtualSpecified();
> +    bool isExplicit = D.getDeclSpec().isExplicitSpecified();
> +    bool isVirtualOkay = false;
> 
>     // Check that the return type is not an abstract class type.
>     // For record types, this is done by the AbstractClassUsageDiagnoser once
> @@ -3593,7 +3594,6 @@
>                                    true/*HasPrototype*/);
>     }
>     SetNestedNameSpecifier(NewFD, D);
> -    FunctionTemplate = 0;
>     isExplicitSpecialization = false;
>     isFunctionTemplateSpecialization = false;
>     NumMatchedTemplateParamLists = TemplateParamLists.size();
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits