[cfe-commits] r120890 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/AST/ include/clang/Sema/ lib/AST/ lib/Analysis/ lib/Checker/ lib/CodeGen/ lib/Parse/ lib/Sema/ test/CodeGen/ test/CodeGenObjCXX/ test/Rewriter/ test/Sema/ test/SemaCXX/ test/SemaTemplate/

John McCall rjmccall at apple.com
Fri Dec 3 22:48:10 PST 2010


On Dec 3, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Abramo Bagnara wrote:

> Il 04/12/2010 07:42, John McCall ha scritto:
>> 
>> On Dec 3, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
>> 
>>> Il 04/12/2010 04:47, John McCall ha scritto:
>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/Expr.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/Expr.cpp Fri Dec  3 21:47:34 2010
>>>> @@ -824,6 +824,8 @@
>>>>    return "LValueBitCast";
>>>>  case CK_LValueToRValue:
>>>>    return "LValueToRValue";
>>>> +  case CK_GetObjCProperty:
>>>> +    return "GetObjCProperty";
>>>>  case CK_NoOp:
>>>>    return "NoOp";
>>>>  case CK_BaseToDerived:
>>>> @@ -1722,6 +1724,24 @@
>>>>  }
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> +Expr *Expr::IgnoreParenLValueCasts() {
>>>> +  Expr *E = this;
>>>> +  while (E) {
>>>> +    if (ParenExpr *P = dyn_cast<ParenExpr>(E)) {
>>>> +      E = P->getSubExpr();
>>>> +      continue;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    if (CastExpr *P = dyn_cast<CastExpr>(E)) {
>>>> +      if (P->getCastKind() == CK_LValueToRValue) {
>>>> +        E = P->getSubExpr();
>>>> +        continue;
>>>> +      }
>>>> +    }
>>>> +    break;
>>>> +  }
>>>> +  return E;
>>>> +}
>>> 
>>> What about __extension__ skipping?
>> 
>> Good point.  I *think* we don't need that here because this method is meant to just be a hack to simplify workarounds in the static analyzer, but Ted might have thoughts.  For one, I don't know whether the analyzer generally pays attention to __extension__ nodes.
> 
> Whenever it calls IgnoreParen* helpers it *does* pay attention: they are
> always skipped.

In that case, I'll add __extension__ skipping, thanks.

John.



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list