[cfe-commits] [Patch][Review Request]Fix for PR7287
Jim Goodnow II
jim at thegoodnows.net
Mon Nov 1 14:51:28 PDT 2010
At 02:06 PM 11/1/2010, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Jim Goodnow II wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Please review and commit this patch for PR7287. Thanks.
>This isn't quite the right fix, because it won't handle, e.g.,
>direct calls to an operator
> operator+(x, y)
>Instead, we should probably use FD->getIdentifier() and bail out
>early if it returns NULL.
> - Doug
> > - jim
On the other hand, using getIdentifier() would be more general and
handle other potential cases where there isn't a name. Are there such cases?
More information about the cfe-commits