[cfe-commits] r114153 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/constructor-init.cpp
John McCall
rjmccall at apple.com
Thu Sep 16 19:31:44 PDT 2010
Author: rjmccall
Date: Thu Sep 16 21:31:44 2010
New Revision: 114153
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=114153&view=rev
Log:
Currently we're initializing the vtable pointers of a class only after
the bases are completely initialized. This won't work --- base
initializer expressions can rely on the vtables having been set up.
Check for uses of 'this' in the initializers and force a vtable
initialization if found.
This might not be good enough; we might need to extend this to handle
the possibility of arbitrary code finding an external reference to this
(not yet completely-constructed!) object and accessing through it,
in which case we'll probably find ourselves doing a lot more unnecessary
stores.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/constructor-init.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp?rev=114153&r1=114152&r2=114153&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGClass.cpp Thu Sep 16 21:31:44 2010
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include "CGDebugInfo.h"
#include "CodeGenFunction.h"
#include "clang/AST/CXXInheritance.h"
+#include "clang/AST/EvaluatedExprVisitor.h"
#include "clang/AST/RecordLayout.h"
#include "clang/AST/StmtCXX.h"
@@ -334,6 +335,29 @@
CGF.EmitCXXDestructorCall(D, Dtor_Base, BaseIsVirtual, Addr);
}
};
+
+ /// A visitor which checks whether an initializer uses 'this' in a
+ /// way which requires the vtable to be properly set.
+ struct DynamicThisUseChecker : EvaluatedExprVisitor<DynamicThisUseChecker> {
+ typedef EvaluatedExprVisitor<DynamicThisUseChecker> super;
+
+ bool UsesThis;
+
+ DynamicThisUseChecker(ASTContext &C) : super(C), UsesThis(false) {}
+
+ // Black-list all explicit and implicit references to 'this'.
+ //
+ // Do we need to worry about external references to 'this' derived
+ // from arbitrary code? If so, then anything which runs arbitrary
+ // external code might potentially access the vtable.
+ void VisitCXXThisExpr(CXXThisExpr *E) { UsesThis = true; }
+ };
+}
+
+static bool BaseInitializerUsesThis(ASTContext &C, const Expr *Init) {
+ DynamicThisUseChecker Checker(C);
+ Checker.Visit(const_cast<Expr*>(Init));
+ return Checker.UsesThis;
}
static void EmitBaseInitializer(CodeGenFunction &CGF,
@@ -355,6 +379,12 @@
if (CtorType == Ctor_Base && isBaseVirtual)
return;
+ // If the initializer for the base (other than the constructor
+ // itself) accesses 'this' in any way, we need to initialize the
+ // vtables.
+ if (BaseInitializerUsesThis(CGF.getContext(), BaseInit->getInit()))
+ CGF.InitializeVTablePointers(ClassDecl);
+
// We can pretend to be a complete class because it only matters for
// virtual bases, and we only do virtual bases for complete ctors.
llvm::Value *V =
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/constructor-init.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/constructor-init.cpp?rev=114153&r1=114152&r2=114153&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/constructor-init.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/constructor-init.cpp Thu Sep 16 21:31:44 2010
@@ -81,6 +81,38 @@
// CHECK: ret void
}
+// Make sure we initialize the vtable pointer if it's required by a
+// base initializer.
+namespace InitVTable {
+ struct A { A(int); };
+ struct B : A {
+ virtual int foo();
+ B();
+ B(int);
+ };
+
+ // CHECK: define void @_ZN10InitVTable1BC2Ev(
+ // CHECK: [[T0:%.*]] = bitcast [[B:%.*]]* [[THIS:%.*]] to i8***
+ // CHECK-NEXT: store i8** getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8*]* @_ZTVN10InitVTable1BE, i64 0, i64 2), i8*** [[T0]]
+ // CHECK: [[VTBL:%.*]] = load i32 ([[B]]*)*** {{%.*}}
+ // CHECK-NEXT: [[FNP:%.*]] = getelementptr inbounds i32 ([[B]]*)** [[VTBL]], i64 0
+ // CHECK-NEXT: [[FN:%.*]] = load i32 ([[B]]*)** [[FNP]]
+ // CHECK-NEXT: [[ARG:%.*]] = call i32 [[FN]]([[B]]* [[THIS]])
+ // CHECK-NEXT: call void @_ZN10InitVTable1AC2Ei({{.*}}* %1, i32 [[ARG]])
+ // CHECK-NEXT: [[T0:%.*]] = bitcast [[B]]* [[THIS]] to i8***
+ // CHECK-NEXT: store i8** getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8*]* @_ZTVN10InitVTable1BE, i64 0, i64 2), i8*** [[T0]]
+ // CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+ B::B() : A(foo()) {}
+
+ // CHECK: define void @_ZN10InitVTable1BC2Ei(
+ // CHECK: [[ARG:%.*]] = add nsw i32 {{%.*}}, 5
+ // CHECK-NEXT: call void @_ZN10InitVTable1AC2Ei({{.*}}* {{%.*}}, i32 [[ARG]])
+ // CHECK-NEXT: [[T0:%.*]] = bitcast [[B]]* {{%.*}} to i8***
+ // CHECK-NEXT: store i8** getelementptr inbounds ([3 x i8*]* @_ZTVN10InitVTable1BE, i64 0, i64 2), i8*** [[T0]]
+ // CHECK-NEXT: ret void
+ B::B(int x) : A(x + 5) {}
+}
+
template<typename T>
struct X {
X(const X &);
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list