[cfe-commits] r109044 - /cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Wed Jul 21 19:19:29 PDT 2010


On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:
>
>> Author: ddunbar
>> Date: Wed Jul 21 17:09:09 2010
>> New Revision: 109044
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=109044&view=rev
>> Log:
>> tests: XFAIL this test on win32, someone else can hunt this one down.
>
> If you're going to XFAIL it (which is fine by me), could you revert r109029 as well? We got better testing before r109029.

Is there a specific case you are worried about, and can I fix the
FileCheck version to cover that case instead?

 - Daniel

>        - Doug
>
>> Modified:
>>    cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c
>>
>> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c?rev=109044&r1=109043&r2=109044&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c (original)
>> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Lexer/preamble.c Wed Jul 21 17:09:09 2010
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>
>> // RUN: %clang_cc1 -print-preamble %s > %t
>> // RUN: FileCheck < %t %s
>> +// XFAIL: win32
>>
>> // CHECK: // Preamble detection test: see below for comments and test commands.
>> // CHECK-NEXT: //
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>




More information about the cfe-commits mailing list