[cfe-commits] r96371 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp
Douglas Gregor
dgregor at apple.com
Tue Feb 16 11:28:17 PST 2010
Author: dgregor
Date: Tue Feb 16 13:28:15 2010
New Revision: 96371
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=96371&view=rev
Log:
Do not try to instantiate invalid declarations. It's a recipe for
disaster. Fixes PR6161.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp?rev=96371&r1=96370&r2=96371&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiateDecl.cpp Tue Feb 16 13:28:15 2010
@@ -1304,6 +1304,9 @@
Decl *Sema::SubstDecl(Decl *D, DeclContext *Owner,
const MultiLevelTemplateArgumentList &TemplateArgs) {
TemplateDeclInstantiator Instantiator(*this, Owner, TemplateArgs);
+ if (D->isInvalidDecl())
+ return 0;
+
return Instantiator.Visit(D);
}
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp?rev=96371&r1=96370&r2=96371&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaCXX/new-delete.cpp Tue Feb 16 13:28:15 2010
@@ -159,12 +159,10 @@
}
template <class T> struct TBase {
- void* operator new(T size, int); // expected-error {{'operator new' cannot take a dependent type as first parameter; use size_t}}\
- // expected-error {{'operator new' takes type size_t}}
+ void* operator new(T size, int); // expected-error {{'operator new' cannot take a dependent type as first parameter; use size_t}}
};
-// FIXME: We should not try to instantiate operator new, since it is invalid.
-TBase<int> t1; // expected-note {{in instantiation of template class 'struct TBase<int>' requested here}}
+TBase<int> t1;
class X6 {
public:
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp?rev=96371&r1=96370&r2=96371&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaTemplate/explicit-specialization-member.cpp Tue Feb 16 13:28:15 2010
@@ -9,3 +9,15 @@
template<> void X0<char>::f0(char);
template<> void X0<char>::f1(type);
+
+namespace PR6161 {
+ template<typename _CharT>
+ class numpunct : public locale::facet // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier 'locale'}} \
+ // expected-error{{expected class name}} \
+ // expected-note{{attempt to specialize declaration here}}
+ {
+ static locale::id id; // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier}}
+ };
+ numpunct<char>::~numpunct(); // expected-error{{template specialization requires 'template<>'}} \
+ // expected-error{{specialization of member 'PR6161::numpunct<char>::~numpunct' does not specialize an instantiated member}}
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list