[cfe-commits] r96274 - /cfe/trunk/test/Rewriter/rewrite-implementation.mm

[Daniel Dunbar]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Fariborz Jahanian <fjahanian at apple.com> wrote:
> Author: fjahanian
> Date: Mon Feb 15 15:37:11 2010
> New Revision: 96274
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=96274&view=rev
> Log:
> Test to compile the rewritten file for my last patch.
> (radar 7649577 related).
>
> Added:
>    cfe/trunk/test/Rewriter/rewrite-implementation.mm
>
> Added: cfe/trunk/test/Rewriter/rewrite-implementation.mm
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Rewriter/rewrite-implementation.mm?rev=96274&view=auto
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/test/Rewriter/rewrite-implementation.mm (added)
> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Rewriter/rewrite-implementation.mm Mon Feb 15 15:37:11 2010
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x objective-c++ -fblocks -fms-extensions -rewrite-objc %s -o %t-rw.cpp
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -DSEL="void *" -S %t-rw.cpp

Does using -S here make sense, wouldn't -fsyntax-only be just as good?

 - Daniel

> +// radar 7649577
> +
> + at interface a
> + at end
> +
> + at interface b : a
> + at end
> +
> + at implementation b
> + at end
> +
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>