[cfe-commits] r96123 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/CodeGen/CGVtable.cpp test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp

Anders Carlsson andersca at mac.com
Sat Feb 13 14:05:24 PST 2010


Author: andersca
Date: Sat Feb 13 16:05:23 2010
New Revision: 96123

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=96123&view=rev
Log:
Start laying out secondary vtables.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVtable.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVtable.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVtable.cpp?rev=96123&r1=96122&r2=96123&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVtable.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/CGVtable.cpp Sat Feb 13 16:05:23 2010
@@ -758,16 +758,15 @@
   /// primary bases to the vtable components vector.
   void AddMethods(BaseSubobject Base, PrimaryBasesSetTy &PrimaryBases);
   
-  /// layoutSimpleVtable - A test function that will layout very simple vtables
-  /// without any bases. Just used for testing for now.
-  void layoutSimpleVtable(BaseSubobject Base);
+  /// layoutVtable - Layout a vtable and all its secondary vtables.
+  void layoutVtable(BaseSubobject Base);
   
 public:
   VtableBuilder(CGVtableInfo &VtableInfo, const CXXRecordDecl *MostDerivedClass)
     : VtableInfo(VtableInfo), MostDerivedClass(MostDerivedClass), 
     Context(MostDerivedClass->getASTContext()), Overriders(MostDerivedClass) { 
 
-    layoutSimpleVtable(BaseSubobject(MostDerivedClass, 0));
+    layoutVtable(BaseSubobject(MostDerivedClass, 0));
   }
 
   /// dumpLayout - Dump the vtable layout.
@@ -849,7 +848,7 @@
       assert(Layout.getBaseClassOffset(PrimaryBase) == 0 &&
              "Primary base should have a zero offset!");
     
-    AddMethods(BaseSubobject(PrimaryBase, 0), PrimaryBases);
+    AddMethods(BaseSubobject(PrimaryBase, Base.getBaseOffset()), PrimaryBases);
     
     if (!PrimaryBases.insert(PrimaryBase))
       assert(false && "Found a duplicate primary base!");
@@ -887,14 +886,17 @@
   }
 }
 
-void VtableBuilder::layoutSimpleVtable(BaseSubobject Base) {
+void VtableBuilder::layoutVtable(BaseSubobject Base) {
   const CXXRecordDecl *RD = Base.getBase();
   
   // First, add the offset to top.
-  Components.push_back(VtableComponent::MakeOffsetToTop(0));
+  // FIXME: This is not going to be right for construction vtables.
+  // FIXME: We should not use -8 here.
+  int64_t OffsetToTop = -(int64_t)Base.getBaseOffset() / 8;
+  Components.push_back(VtableComponent::MakeOffsetToTop(OffsetToTop));
   
   // Next, add the RTTI.
-  Components.push_back(VtableComponent::MakeRTTI(RD));
+  Components.push_back(VtableComponent::MakeRTTI(MostDerivedClass));
   
   uint64_t AddressPoint = Components.size();
 
@@ -919,7 +921,7 @@
   const ASTRecordLayout &Layout = Context.getASTRecordLayout(RD);
   const CXXRecordDecl *PrimaryBase = Layout.getPrimaryBase();
 
-  // Traverse bases.
+  // Layout secondary vtables.
   for (CXXRecordDecl::base_class_const_iterator I = RD->bases_begin(),
        E = RD->bases_end(); I != E; ++I) {
     const CXXRecordDecl *BaseDecl = 
@@ -931,7 +933,12 @@
     
     assert(!I->isVirtual() && "FIXME: Handle virtual bases");
     
-    assert(false && "FIXME: Handle secondary virtual tables!");
+    // Get the base offset of this base.
+    uint64_t BaseOffset = Base.getBaseOffset() + 
+      Layout.getBaseClassOffset(BaseDecl);
+
+    // Layout this secondary vtable.
+    layoutVtable(BaseSubobject(BaseDecl, BaseOffset));
   }
 }
 

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp?rev=96123&r1=96122&r2=96123&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp Sat Feb 13 16:05:23 2010
@@ -196,11 +196,50 @@
   virtual void g();
   virtual R3 *f() = 0;
 };
-
 void F::g() { }
 
 }
 
+namespace Test5 {
+
+// Simple secondary vtables without this-adjustments.
+struct A {
+  virtual void f();
+  virtual void g();
+  int a;
+};
+
+struct B1 : A {
+  virtual void f();
+  int b1;
+};
+
+struct B2 : A {
+  virtual void g();
+  int b2;
+};
+
+// CHECK:     Vtable for 'Test5::C' (9 entries).
+// CHECK-NEXT:   0 | offset_to_top (0)
+// CHECK-NEXT:   1 | Test5::C RTTI
+// CHECK-NEXT:       -- (Test5::A, 0) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT:       -- (Test5::B1, 0) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT:       -- (Test5::C, 0) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT:   2 | void Test5::B1::f()
+// CHECK-NEXT:   3 | void Test5::A::g()
+// CHECK-NEXT:   4 | void Test5::C::h()
+// CHECK-NEXT:   5 | offset_to_top (-16)
+// CHECK-NEXT:   6 | Test5::C RTTI
+// CHECK-NEXT:       -- (Test5::A, 16) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT:       -- (Test5::B2, 16) vtable address --
+// CHECK-NEXT:   7 | void Test5::A::f()
+// CHECK-NEXT:   8 | void Test5::B2::g()
+struct C : B1, B2 {
+  virtual void h();
+};
+void C::h() { }  
+}
+
 // For now, just verify this doesn't crash.
 namespace test0 {
   struct Obj {};





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list