[cfe-commits] r84149 - /cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html

[Douglas Gregor]

Author: dgregor
Date: Wed Oct 14 16:54:48 2009
New Revision: 84149

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=84149&view=rev
Log:
Our C++ support is far enough along now that we shouldn't be recommending the use of Elsa

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html

Modified: cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html?rev=84149&r1=84148&r2=84149&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/www/comparison.html Wed Oct 14 16:54:48 2009
@@ -122,11 +122,6 @@
     <p>Pro's of Elsa vs clang:</p>
     
     <ul>
-    <li>Elsa's support for C++ is far beyond what clang provides.  If you need
-        C++ support in the next year, Elsa is a great way to get it.  That said,
-        Elsa is missing important support for templates and other pieces: for 
-        example, it is not capable of compiling the GCC STL headers from any
-        version newer than GCC 3.4.</li>
     <li>Elsa's parser and AST is designed to be easily extensible by adding
         grammar rules.  Clang has a very simple and easily hackable parser,
         but requires you to write C++ code to do it.</li>