Sat Jun 13 10:18:19 PDT 2009

On Jun 12, 2009, at 11:26 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:

>
> Personally, I don't see any point in distinguishing Lex/Parse/Sema/CG,
> although we've been doing it for a while. Still, we can tell what kind
> of test we have based on the RUN line anyway.

I agree, I think it would make sense to get rid of the distinction.   
If a feature doesn't have codegen support, we can have one test that  
just runs -fsyntax-only and one that does codegen.  That would show as  
"some support".

-Chris