[cfe-commits] r72770 - in /cfe/trunk: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp

[Eli Friedman]

Author: efriedma
Date: Wed Jun  3 07:22:01 2009
New Revision: 72770

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=72770&view=rev
Log:
Minor cleanup for implicit int warnings.


Modified:
    cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td?rev=72770&r1=72769&r2=72770&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td Wed Jun  3 07:22:01 2009
@@ -1789,12 +1789,9 @@
 def warn_receiver_forward_class : Warning<
     "receiver %0 is a forward class and corresponding @interface may not exist">;
 def note_method_sent_forward_class : Note<"method %0 is used for the forward class">;
-def warn_missing_declspec : ExtWarn<
+def ext_missing_declspec : ExtWarn<
   "declaration specifier missing, defaulting to 'int'">;
-def warn_missing_type_specifier : Warning<
-  "type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'">,
-  InGroup<ImplicitInt>;
-def warn_missing_type_specifier_c99 : ExtWarn<
+def ext_missing_type_specifier : ExtWarn<
   "type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'">,
   InGroup<ImplicitInt>;
 def err_decimal_unsupported : Error<

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp?rev=72770&r1=72769&r2=72770&view=diff

==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaType.cpp Wed Jun  3 07:22:01 2009
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
       if (DS.isEmpty()) {
         if (DeclLoc.isInvalid())
           DeclLoc = DS.getSourceRange().getBegin();
-        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::warn_missing_declspec)
+        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::ext_missing_declspec)
           << DS.getSourceRange()
         << CodeModificationHint::CreateInsertion(DS.getSourceRange().getBegin(),
                                                  "int");
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
         Diag(DeclLoc, diag::err_missing_type_specifier)
           << DS.getSourceRange();
       else
-        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::warn_missing_type_specifier)
+        Diag(DeclLoc, diag::ext_missing_type_specifier)
           << DS.getSourceRange();
 
       // FIXME: If we could guarantee that the result would be well-formed, it