[cfe-commits] r67460 - in /cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen: CGCall.cpp CGDecl.cpp

[Chris Lattner]

On Mar 21, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Daniel Dunbar wrote:

> Along this train; I think that we should probably just drop all  
> names that are generic. "call" isn't really better than %n (or  
> %tmpn) and it doesn't seem worth littering the code. If someone  
> cares about having generic names, we can always just make the  
> instnamer pass a little more friendly.
>
> What do you think?

It is sometimes useful to have the names indicate what operation they  
came from.  Call is probably not very important, but "inc" and "plus"  
and "div" etc can be.

I don't have a strong opinion either way.

-Chris