[cfe-commits] r60852 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp test/SemaObjC/method-conflict.m
Steve Naroff
snaroff at apple.com
Wed Dec 10 14:14:40 PST 2008
Author: snaroff
Date: Wed Dec 10 16:14:21 2008
New Revision: 60852
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=60852&view=rev
Log:
The "real" fix for <rdar://problem/6424347> clang on xcode: Assertion failed: (0 && "unexpected type"), function mergeTypes,
Commit r60845 was premature.
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/method-conflict.m
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp?rev=60852&r1=60851&r2=60852&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp Wed Dec 10 16:14:21 2008
@@ -2122,36 +2122,35 @@
if (LHSClass == Type::ObjCQualifiedInterface) LHSClass = Type::ObjCInterface;
if (RHSClass == Type::ObjCQualifiedInterface) RHSClass = Type::ObjCInterface;
- // ID is compatible with all qualified id types.
- if (LHS->isObjCQualifiedIdType()) {
- if (const PointerType *PT = RHS->getAsPointerType()) {
- QualType pType = PT->getPointeeType();
- if (isObjCIdType(pType))
- return LHS;
- // FIXME: need to use ObjCQualifiedIdTypesAreCompatible(LHS, RHS, true).
- // Unfortunately, this API is part of Sema (which we don't have access
- // to. Need to refactor. The following check is insufficient, since we
- // need to make sure the class implements the protocol.
- if (pType->isObjCInterfaceType())
- return LHS;
- }
- }
- if (RHS->isObjCQualifiedIdType()) {
- if (const PointerType *PT = LHS->getAsPointerType()) {
- QualType pType = PT->getPointeeType();
- if (isObjCIdType(pType))
- return RHS;
- // FIXME: need to use ObjCQualifiedIdTypesAreCompatible(LHS, RHS, true).
- // Unfortunately, this API is part of Sema (which we don't have access
- // to. Need to refactor. The following check is insufficient, since we
- // need to make sure the class implements the protocol.
- if (pType->isObjCInterfaceType())
- return RHS;
- }
- }
// If the canonical type classes don't match.
if (LHSClass != RHSClass) {
-
+ // ID is compatible with all qualified id types.
+ if (LHS->isObjCQualifiedIdType()) {
+ if (const PointerType *PT = RHS->getAsPointerType()) {
+ QualType pType = PT->getPointeeType();
+ if (isObjCIdType(pType))
+ return LHS;
+ // FIXME: need to use ObjCQualifiedIdTypesAreCompatible(LHS, RHS, true).
+ // Unfortunately, this API is part of Sema (which we don't have access
+ // to. Need to refactor. The following check is insufficient, since we
+ // need to make sure the class implements the protocol.
+ if (pType->isObjCInterfaceType())
+ return LHS;
+ }
+ }
+ if (RHS->isObjCQualifiedIdType()) {
+ if (const PointerType *PT = LHS->getAsPointerType()) {
+ QualType pType = PT->getPointeeType();
+ if (isObjCIdType(pType))
+ return RHS;
+ // FIXME: need to use ObjCQualifiedIdTypesAreCompatible(LHS, RHS, true).
+ // Unfortunately, this API is part of Sema (which we don't have access
+ // to. Need to refactor. The following check is insufficient, since we
+ // need to make sure the class implements the protocol.
+ if (pType->isObjCInterfaceType())
+ return RHS;
+ }
+ }
// C99 6.7.2.2p4: Each enumerated type shall be compatible with char,
// a signed integer type, or an unsigned integer type.
if (const EnumType* ETy = LHS->getAsEnumType()) {
@@ -2253,6 +2252,9 @@
// Distinct ObjC interfaces are not compatible; see canAssignObjCInterfaces
// for checking assignment/comparison safety
return QualType();
+ case Type::ObjCQualifiedId:
+ // Distinct qualified id's are not compatible.
+ return QualType();
default:
assert(0 && "unexpected type");
return QualType();
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/method-conflict.m
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/method-conflict.m?rev=60852&r1=60851&r2=60852&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/method-conflict.m (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/SemaObjC/method-conflict.m Wed Dec 10 16:14:21 2008
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
}
CSSM_FIELDGROUP, *CSSM_FIELDGROUP_PTR;
@protocol XDUMLClassifier;
- at protocol XDUMLClassInterfaceCommons <XDUMLClassifier> @end @protocol XDUMLImplementation;
+ at protocol XDUMLClassInterfaceCommons <XDUMLClassifier> // expected-warning {{cannot find protocol definition for 'XDUMLClassifier'}}
+ at end @protocol XDUMLImplementation;
@protocol XDUMLElement <NSObject> - (NSArray *) ownedElements;
@end @protocol XDUMLDataType;
@protocol XDUMLNamedElement <XDUMLElement> - (NSString *) name;
@@ -39,7 +40,7 @@
@end @class XDSCOperation;
@interface XDSCClassFormatter : NSObject {
}
-+ (NSUInteger) compartmentsForClassifier: (id <XDUMLClassifier>) classifier withSpecification: (XDSCDisplaySpecification *) displaySpec;
++ (NSUInteger) compartmentsForClassifier: (id <XDUMLClassifier>) classifier withSpecification: (XDSCDisplaySpecification *) displaySpec; // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
@end
@class NSString;
@implementation XDSCClassFormatter
@@ -47,7 +48,7 @@
+ appendVisibility: (id <XDUMLNamedElement>) element withSpecification: (XDSCDisplaySpecification *) displaySpec to: (NSMutableAttributedString *) attributedString
{
}
-// FIXME: should we warn? (since the protocols are different). FWIW...GCC doesn't currently.
-+ (NSUInteger) compartmentsForClassifier: (id <XDSCClassifier>) classifier withSpecification: (XDSCDisplaySpecification *) displaySpec {
+// GCC doesn't currently warn about this.
++ (NSUInteger) compartmentsForClassifier: (id <XDSCClassifier>) classifier withSpecification: (XDSCDisplaySpecification *) displaySpec { // expected-warning {{conflicting types for 'compartmentsForClassifier:withSpecification:'}}
}
@end
\ No newline at end of file
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list