[cfe-commits] r59094 - in /cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen: CGBuilder.h CodeGenFunction.h

Daniel Dunbar daniel at zuster.org
Tue Nov 11 19:58:54 PST 2008


Hi Eli,

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote:
>> Author: ddunbar
>> Date: Tue Nov 11 18:01:12 2008
>> New Revision: 59094
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=59094&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Disable generation of basic block names in NDEBUG mode.
>>
>> Revert to enabling generation of instruction names when not in NDEBUG
>> mode.
>
> Is this really a good idea?  Normally NDEBUG doesn't change the
> visible behavior of the program.

One response would be that the names on LLVM instructions aren't
intended to be part of the "visible" behavior of the compiler.

Actually, I would prefer this was always a runtime option, but the
current design of the IRBuilder class is basing this off a template
parameter.

But in practice, is this a bad idea? What are you concerned about? The
missing names triggering some different behavior in the backend which
results in a bug that only shows up in Release-Asserts mode?

 - Daniel

> -Eli
>



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list