[cfe-commits] r47539 - /cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.h

[Chris Lattner]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Neil Booth wrote:
> No harm.  I wouldn't bother with C03 and C99; C99 should just be C06.
> A lot of the changes are fixing errata in the standard anyway.

Right.

> C94 at least had something quite new in it: digraphs and a couple(?)
> of new headers.  But it was still just an updated C90.

Ok.

> I think more interesting and valuable is to support the drafts of
> things like Decimal arithmetic, unicode and raw strings, and embedded
> C with extra compiler switches.  It good to have more than just EDG
> implement them.

I think it would be great to have these features.  If a contributor were 
interested in working on them, it would be great to see them in clang. 
For me personally, getting to 'basic functionality' is stage #1, followed 
by GCC parity as stage #2.  After that, other new language features start 
being more interesting to me.  The great thing about open source is that 
anyone can push the code in a direction they are interested in though, so 
go for it!

-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/