[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] a8d2d1: Parallelize module loading in POSIX dyld code (#13...
Tom Yang via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 31 13:29:53 PDT 2025
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: a8d2d169c7add4b0106ae76e186cf815c0b84825
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a8d2d169c7add4b0106ae76e186cf815c0b84825
Author: Tom Yang <zhenyutyang at gmail.com>
Date: 2025-03-31 (Mon, 31 Mar 2025)
Changed paths:
M lldb/include/lldb/Target/Target.h
M lldb/source/Plugins/DynamicLoader/POSIX-DYLD/DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD.cpp
M lldb/source/Plugins/DynamicLoader/POSIX-DYLD/DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD.h
M lldb/source/Target/Target.cpp
M lldb/source/Target/TargetProperties.td
Log Message:
-----------
Parallelize module loading in POSIX dyld code (#130912)
This patch improves LLDB launch time on Linux machines for **preload
scenarios**, particularly for executables with a lot of shared library
dependencies (or modules). Specifically:
* Launching a binary with `target.preload-symbols = true`
* Attaching to a process with `target.preload-symbols = true`.
It's completely controlled by a new flag added in the first commit
`plugin.dynamic-loader.posix-dyld.parallel-module-load`, which *defaults
to false*. This was inspired by similar work on Darwin #110646.
Some rough numbers to showcase perf improvement, run on a very beefy
machine:
* Executable with ~5600 modules: baseline 45s, improvement 15s
* Executable with ~3800 modules: baseline 25s, improvement 10s
* Executable with ~6650 modules: baseline 67s, improvement 20s
* Executable with ~12500 modules: baseline 185s, improvement 85s
* Executable with ~14700 modules: baseline 235s, improvement 120s
A lot of targets we deal with have a *ton* of modules, and unfortunately
we're unable to convince other folks to reduce the number of modules, so
performance improvements like this can be very impactful for user
experience.
This patch achieves the performance improvement by parallelizing
`DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RefreshModules` for the launch scenario, and
`DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::LoadAllCurrentModules` for the attach scenario.
The commits have some context on their specific changes as well --
hopefully this helps the review.
# More context on implementation
We discovered the bottlenecks by via `perf record -g -p <lldb's pid>` on
a Linux machine. With an executable known to have 1000s of shared
library dependencies, I ran
```
(lldb) b main
(lldb) r
# taking a while
```
and showed the resulting perf trace (snippet shown)
```
Samples: 85K of event 'cycles:P', Event count (approx.): 54615855812
Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
- 93.54% 0.00% intern-state libc.so.6 [.] clone3
clone3
start_thread
lldb_private::HostNativeThreadBase::ThreadCreateTrampoline(void*) r
std::_Function_handler<void* (), lldb_private::Process::StartPrivateStateThread(bool)::$_0>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&)
lldb_private::Process::RunPrivateStateThread(bool) n
- lldb_private::Process::HandlePrivateEvent(std::shared_ptr<lldb_private::Event>&)
- 93.54% lldb_private::Process::ShouldBroadcastEvent(lldb_private::Event*)
- 93.54% lldb_private::ThreadList::ShouldStop(lldb_private::Event*)
- lldb_private::Thread::ShouldStop(lldb_private::Event*) *
- 93.53% lldb_private::StopInfoBreakpoint::ShouldStopSynchronous(lldb_private::Event*) t
- 93.52% lldb_private::BreakpointSite::ShouldStop(lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*) i
lldb_private::BreakpointLocationCollection::ShouldStop(lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*) k
lldb_private::BreakpointLocation::ShouldStop(lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*) b
lldb_private::BreakpointOptions::InvokeCallback(lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*, unsigned long, unsigned long) i
DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RendezvousBreakpointHit(void*, lldb_private::StoppointCallbackContext*, unsigned long, unsigned lo
- DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RefreshModules() O
- 93.42% DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::RefreshModules()::$_0::operator()(DYLDRendezvous::SOEntry const&) const u
- 93.40% DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::LoadModuleAtAddress(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, unsigned long, unsigned long, bools
- lldb_private::DynamicLoader::LoadModuleAtAddress(lldb_private::FileSpec const&, unsigned long, unsigned long, boos
- 83.90% lldb_private::DynamicLoader::FindModuleViaTarget(lldb_private::FileSpec const&) o
- 83.01% lldb_private::Target::GetOrCreateModule(lldb_private::ModuleSpec const&, bool, lldb_private::Status*
- 77.89% lldb_private::Module::PreloadSymbols()
- 44.06% lldb_private::Symtab::PreloadSymbols()
- 43.66% lldb_private::Symtab::InitNameIndexes()
...
```
We saw that majority of time was spent in `RefreshModules`, with the
main culprit within it `LoadModuleAtAddress` which eventually calls
`PreloadSymbols`.
At first, `DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD::LoadModuleAtAddress` appears fairly
independent -- most of it deals with different files and then getting or
creating Modules from these files. The portions that aren't independent
seem to deal with ModuleLists, which appear concurrency safe. There were
members of `DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD` I had to synchronize though: namely
`m_loaded_modules` which `DynamicLoaderPOSIXDYLD` maintains to map its
loaded modules to their link addresses. Without synchronizing this, I
ran into SEGFAULTS and other issues when running `check-lldb`. I also
locked the assignment and comparison of `m_interpreter_module`, which
may be unnecessary.
# Alternate implementations
When creating this patch, another implementation I considered was
directly background-ing the call to `Module::PreloadSymbol` in
`Target::GetOrCreateModule`. It would have the added benefit of working
across platforms generically, and appeared to be concurrency safe. It
was done via `Debugger::GetThreadPool().async` directly. However, there
were a ton of concurrency issues, so I abandoned that approach for now.
# Testing
With the feature active, I tested via `ninja check-lldb` on both Debug
and Release builds several times (~5 or 6 altogether?), and didn't spot
additional failing or flaky tests.
I also tested manually on several different binaries, some with around
14000 modules, but just basic operations: launching, reaching main,
setting breakpoint, stepping, showing some backtraces.
I've also tested with the flag off just to make sure things behave
properly synchronously.
To unsubscribe from these emails, change your notification settings at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/settings/notifications
More information about the All-commits
mailing list