[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] b56b3d: [Clang][Sema] Don't consider top-level cv-qualifie...
Younan Zhang via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 12 21:34:39 PST 2024
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: b56b3d75b04cda762ac8e15b7ec6fa4f52a6735a
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b56b3d75b04cda762ac8e15b7ec6fa4f52a6735a
Author: Younan Zhang <zyn7109 at gmail.com>
Date: 2024-02-13 (Tue, 13 Feb 2024)
Changed paths:
M clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
M clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp
M clang/test/CXX/over/over.match/over.match.best/p1-2a.cpp
Log Message:
-----------
[Clang][Sema] Don't consider top-level cv-qualifiers in template partial orderings (#81449)
This fixes a regression since
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/340eac01f7dad6c24cee35dd35f2484098dd6b1a,
from which we compared function parameter types with cv-qualifiers taken
into account. However, as per [dcl.fct]/p5:
> After producing the list of parameter types, any top-level
cv-qualifiers modifying
> a parameter type are deleted when forming the function type.
Thus, I think we should use `hasSameUnqualifiedType` for type
comparison.
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/75404.
More information about the All-commits
mailing list