[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] 9aa394: [AArch64] Prefer to fold dup into fmul/fma as oppo...
David Green via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 7 13:24:40 PST 2023
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: 9aa39481d9eb718e872993791547053a3c1f16d5
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9aa39481d9eb718e872993791547053a3c1f16d5
Author: David Green <david.green at arm.com>
Date: 2023-03-07 (Tue, 07 Mar 2023)
Changed paths:
M llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
M llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/ld1postmul.ll
Log Message:
-----------
[AArch64] Prefer to fold dup into fmul/fma as opposed to ld1r
There is a fold to create LD1DUPpost from dup(load) that can be postinc. If the
dup is used by a "by element" operation such as fmul or fma then it can be
slightly better to fold the dup into the fmul instead, which produces slightly
fast code.
ld1r { v1.4s }, [x0], #4
fmul v0.4s, v1.4s, v0.4s
vs
ldr s1, [x0], #4
fmul v0.4s, v0.4s, v1.s[0]
This could also be done with integer operations such as smull/umull too, so
long as the load/dup gets correctly combined into the mul operation. Currently
this just operates on foating point types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145184
More information about the All-commits
mailing list