[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] fbf611: [clang-tidy] Extend spelling for CheckOptions

Nathan James via All-commits all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 23 11:59:46 PDT 2022


  Branch: refs/heads/main
  Home:   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
  Commit: fbf611ed2a768999202e2c5e1e1a6c3c6bb94725
      https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/fbf611ed2a768999202e2c5e1e1a6c3c6bb94725
  Author: Nathan James <n.james93 at hotmail.co.uk>
  Date:   2022-06-23 (Thu, 23 Jun 2022)

  Changed paths:
    M clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidyOptions.cpp
    M clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/ClangTidyMain.cpp
    M clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py
    M clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/TidyProviderTests.cpp
    M clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
    M clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/Contributing.rst
    M clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/index.rst
    M clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/google/module.cpp
    A clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/infrastructure/Inputs/config-files/4/key-dict/.clang-tidy
    M clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/infrastructure/config-files.cpp

  Log Message:
  -----------
  [clang-tidy] Extend spelling for CheckOptions

The current way to specify CheckOptions is pretty verbose and unintuitive.
Given that the options are a dictionary it makes much more sense to treat them as such in the config files.
Example:
```
CheckOptions: {SomeCheck.Option: true, SomeCheck.OtherOption: 'ignore'}
# Or
CheckOptions:
  SomeCheck.Option: true
  SomeCheck.OtherOption: 'ignore'
```

This change will still handle the old syntax with no issue, ensuring we don't screw up users current config files.

The only observable differences are support for the new syntax and `-dump=config` will emit using the new syntax.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128337




More information about the All-commits mailing list