[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] ef9d39: [InstCombine] add tests for shuffle with fneg oper...
Sanjay Patel via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri May 6 13:30:41 PDT 2022
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: ef9d39de2f083226a734feb743c5c280ce9d369d
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ef9d39de2f083226a734feb743c5c280ce9d369d
Author: Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com>
Date: 2022-05-06 (Fri, 06 May 2022)
Changed paths:
M llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/vec_shuffle.ll
Log Message:
-----------
[InstCombine] add tests for shuffle with fneg operand(s); NFC
issue #45631
Commit: b331a7ebc1e02f9939d1a4a1509e7eb6cdda3d38
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b331a7ebc1e02f9939d1a4a1509e7eb6cdda3d38
Author: Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com>
Date: 2022-05-06 (Fri, 06 May 2022)
Changed paths:
M llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineVectorOps.cpp
M llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/vec_shuffle-inseltpoison.ll
M llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/vec_shuffle.ll
Log Message:
-----------
[InstCombine] canonicalize fneg after shuffle
For the unary shuffle pattern, this is opposite to what we try
to do with binops, but it seems better to keep it consistent
with the motivating binary shuffle pattern. On that, it is
clearly better on the usual no-extra uses case.
There is a chance that this will pull an fneg away from some
other binop and cause a regression in codegen, but that should
be invertible in the backend. The transform is birectional:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/kKaKCU
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/3Desfw
Fixes #45631
Compare: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/compare/042bd21cf9f4...b331a7ebc1e0
More information about the All-commits
mailing list