[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] 4a54e3: [x86] try to replace 0.0 in fcmp with negated operand
Sanjay Patel via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 31 06:18:03 PDT 2022
Branch: refs/heads/main
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: 4a54e3eed347ca2bcb840c52c553892101afd252
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4a54e3eed347ca2bcb840c52c553892101afd252
Author: Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com>
Date: 2022-03-31 (Thu, 31 Mar 2022)
Changed paths:
M llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
M llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/fp-stack-compare.ll
M llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/setcc-combine.ll
Log Message:
-----------
[x86] try to replace 0.0 in fcmp with negated operand
This inverts a fold recently added to IR with:
3491f2f4b033
We can put -bidirectional on the Alive2 examples to show that
the reverse transforms work:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/8iVQwB
The motivation for the IR change was to improve matching to
'fabs' in IR (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/38828 ),
but it regressed x86 codegen for 'not-quite-fabs' patterns like
(X > -X) ? X : -X.
Ie, when there is no fast-math (nsz), the cmp+select is not a proper
fabs operation, but it does map nicely to the unusual NAN semantics
of MINSS/MAXSS.
I drafted this as a target-independent fold, but it doesn't appear to
help any other targets and seems to cause regressions for SystemZ at
least.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122726
More information about the All-commits
mailing list