[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] c7dcc4: [clang-format] PR48569 clang-format fails to align...

[MyDeveloperDay via All-commits]

  Branch: refs/heads/main
  Home:   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
  Commit: c7dcc4c72588db9ffb7ae379983450193b943f5b
      https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c7dcc4c72588db9ffb7ae379983450193b943f5b
  Author: mydeveloperday <mydeveloperday at gmail.com>
  Date:   2020-12-26 (Sat, 26 Dec 2020)

  Changed paths:
    M clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
    M clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp

  Log Message:
  -----------
  [clang-format] PR48569 clang-format fails to align case label with `switch` with Whitesmith Indentation

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48569

This is a tentative fix which addresses a PR raise regarding Case indentation when working with Whitesmiths Indentation

I could not find online any reference sources as to what the case indentation for Whitesmith's should be (or be allowed to be)

But according to the documentation, we don't obey the rules for Whitesmith's

```
In particular, the documentation states that this option is to "indent case labels one level from the switch statement. When false, use the same indentation level as for the switch statement."
```

The behaviour we add here is actually as the TODO in the tests used to state in {D67627}, but when {D82016} was added and I brought these tests out from being TODO I realized I changed the indentation.

Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93806