[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] 91dc54: Set Huge Page mode on shadow regions based on no_h...
Z via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 20 09:52:11 PDT 2020
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: 91dc545bf24daa60c21c93039408061194dd0ab3
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91dc545bf24daa60c21c93039408061194dd0ab3
Author: Jianzhou Zhao <jianzhouzh at google.com>
Date: 2020-10-20 (Tue, 20 Oct 2020)
Changed paths:
M compiler-rt/lib/dfsan/dfsan.cpp
M compiler-rt/test/dfsan/release_shadow_space.c
Log Message:
-----------
Set Huge Page mode on shadow regions based on no_huge_pages_for_shadow
It turned out that at dynamic shared library mode, the memory access
pattern can increase memory footprint significantly on OS when transparent
hugepages (THP) are enabled. This could cause >70x memory overhead than
running a static linked binary. For example, a static binary with RSS
overhead 300M can use > 23G RSS if it is built dynamically.
/proc/../smaps shows in 6204552 kB RSS 6141952 kB relates to
AnonHugePages.
Also such a high RSS happens in some rate: around 25% runs may use > 23G RSS, the
rest uses in between 6-23G. I guess this may relate to how user memory
is allocated and distributted across huge pages.
THP is a trade-off between time and space. We have a flag
no_huge_pages_for_shadow for sanitizer. It is true by default but DFSan
did not follow this. Depending on if a target is built statically or
dynamically, maybe Clang can set no_huge_pages_for_shadow accordingly
after this change. But it still seems fine to follow the default setting of
no_huge_pages_for_shadow. If time is an issue, and users are fine with
high RSS, this flag can be set to false selectively.
More information about the All-commits
mailing list