[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] 31a346: [MLIR][Vector] Add support for TupleGetOp folding ...
andydavis1 via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 31 08:39:23 PDT 2020
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: 31a346cc35c829e207fbf24d8f8f1ee22ca9f140
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/31a346cc35c829e207fbf24d8f8f1ee22ca9f140
Author: Andy Davis <andydavis at google.com>
Date: 2020-03-31 (Tue, 31 Mar 2020)
Changed paths:
M mlir/include/mlir/Dialect/Vector/VectorUtils.h
M mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/VectorTransforms.cpp
M mlir/lib/Dialect/Vector/VectorUtils.cpp
M mlir/test/Dialect/Vector/vector-transforms.mlir
Log Message:
-----------
[MLIR][Vector] Add support for TupleGetOp folding through InsertSlicesOp and ExtractSlicesOp.
Summary:
Add support for TupleGetOp folding through InsertSlicesOp and ExtractSlicesOp.
Vector-to-vector transformations for unrolling and lowering to hardware vectors
can generate chains of structured vector operations (InsertSlicesOp,
ExtractSlicesOp and ShapeCastOp) between the producer of a hardware vector
value and its consumer. Because InsertSlicesOp, ExtractSlicesOp and ShapeCastOp
are structured, we can track the location (tuple index and vector offsets) of
the consumer vector value through the chain of structured operations to the
producer, enabling a much more powerful producer-consumer fowarding of values
through structured ops and tuple, which in turn enables a more powerful
TupleGetOp folding transformation.
Reviewers: nicolasvasilache, aartbik
Reviewed By: aartbik
Subscribers: grosul1, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, liufengdb, Joonsoo, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76889
More information about the All-commits
mailing list