[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] 39e1a9: [AMDGPU] SI_INDIRECT_DST_V* pseudos expansion sho...

alex-t via All-commits all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 10 04:04:38 PDT 2020


  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
  Commit: 39e1a90784b32dbcfcad97dab3c33bb03bfcfcee
      https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/39e1a90784b32dbcfcad97dab3c33bb03bfcfcee
  Author: alex-t <alexander.timofeev at amd.com>
  Date:   2020-03-10 (Tue, 10 Mar 2020)

  Changed paths:
    M llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/SIISelLowering.cpp
    M llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/indirect-addressing-term.ll

  Log Message:
  -----------
   [AMDGPU] SI_INDIRECT_DST_V* pseudos expansion should place EXEC restore to separate basic block

Summary:
When SI_INDIRECT_DST_V* pseudos has indexes in VGPR, they get expanded into the self-looped basic block that modifies EXEC in a loop.

To keep EXEC consistent it is stored before and then re-stored after the pseudo expansion result.

%95:vreg_512 = SI_INDIRECT_DST_V16 %93:vreg_512(tied-def 0), %94:sreg_32, 0, killed %1500:vgpr_32

results to

    s_mov_b64 s[6:7], exec
BB0_16:
    v_readfirstlane_b32 s8, v28
    v_cmp_eq_u32_e32 vcc, s8, v28
    s_and_saveexec_b64 vcc, vcc
    s_set_gpr_idx_on s8, gpr_idx(DST)
    v_mov_b32_e32 v6, v25
    s_set_gpr_idx_off
    s_xor_b64 exec, exec, vcc
    s_cbranch_execnz BB0_16
; %bb.17:
    s_mov_b64 exec, s[6:7]

The bug appeared in case this expansion occurs in the ELSE block of the CF.

Originally

  %110:vreg_512 = SI_INDIRECT_DST_V16 %103:vreg_512(tied-def 0), %85:vgpr_32, 0, %107:vgpr_32,
   %112:sreg_64 = SI_ELSE %108:sreg_64, %bb.19, 0, implicit-def dead $exec, implicit-def dead $scc, implicit $exec

expanded to

         ******************   <== here exec has "THEN" context

    s_mov_b64 s[6:7], exec
BB0_16:
    v_readfirstlane_b32 s8, v28
    v_cmp_eq_u32_e32 vcc, s8, v28
    s_and_saveexec_b64 vcc, vcc
    s_set_gpr_idx_on s8, gpr_idx(DST)
    v_mov_b32_e32 v6, v25
    s_set_gpr_idx_off
    s_xor_b64 exec, exec, vcc
    s_cbranch_execnz BB0_16
; %bb.17:
    s_or_saveexec_b64 s[4:5], s[4:5]   <-- exec mask is restored for "ELSE" but immediately overwritten.
    s_mov_b64 exec, s[6:7]

The rest of the "ELSE" block is executed not by the workitems which constitute the "else mask" but by those which constitute "then mask"

SILowerControlFlow::emitElse always considers the basic block begin() as an insertion point for s_or_saveexec.

Proposed fix:  The SI_INDIRECT_DST_V* procedure should split the reminder block to create landing pad for the EXEC restoration.

Reviewers: rampitec, vpykhtin, nhaehnle

Reviewed By: vpykhtin

Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75472




More information about the All-commits mailing list