[all-commits] [llvm/llvm-project] d5655c: [llvm-dwarfdump][Statistics] Don't count coverage ...
chbessonova via All-commits
all-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 13 06:35:57 PST 2019
Branch: refs/heads/master
Home: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
Commit: d5655c4d2e180b7eadb567ebf7e9a9393dec1355
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d5655c4d2e180b7eadb567ebf7e9a9393dec1355
Author: Kristina Bessonova <kbessonova at accesssoftek.com>
Date: 2019-12-13 (Fri, 13 Dec 2019)
Changed paths:
M llvm/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-locstats.rst
M llvm/test/tools/llvm-dwarfdump/X86/locstats.ll
M llvm/test/tools/llvm-locstats/locstats.ll
M llvm/tools/llvm-dwarfdump/Statistics.cpp
M llvm/utils/llvm-locstats/llvm-locstats.py
Log Message:
-----------
[llvm-dwarfdump][Statistics] Don't count coverage less than 1% as 0%
Summary:
This is a follow up for D70548.
Currently, variables with debug info coverage between 0% and 1% are put into
zero-bucket. D70548 changed the way statistics calculate a variable's coverage:
we began to use enclosing scope rather than a possible variable life range.
Thus more variables might be moved to zero-bucket despite they have some debug
info coverage.
The patch is to distinguish between a variable that has location info but
it's significantly less than its enclosing scope and a variable that doesn't
have it at all.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, dblaikie, avl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71070
More information about the All-commits
mailing list