<html><body>
<p><tt><font size="2">Hi all</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">About the name of the library</font></tt><tt><font size="2">, I vote for -lllomp, i.e. lib name libllomp.a.</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">There is already a (perhaps unofficially named) LOMP library around (which can be used as openmp runtime for clang) and this would make some discussion hard to understand. See references to it here:</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2"><a href="http://cscads.rice.edu/workshops/summer-2012/slides/performance-tools/OpenMP-for-exascale-CScADS.pdf">http://cscads.rice.edu/workshops/summer-2012/slides/performance-tools/OpenMP-for-exascale-CScADS.pdf</a></font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2"><a href="https://www.alcf.anl.gov/files/BlueGeneQ_Optimization.pdf">https://www.alcf.anl.gov/files/BlueGeneQ_Optimization.pdf</a></font></tt><br>
<br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">Thanks</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">-- Carlo</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2">(Apologies if you see this as a replicated e-mail, I tried answering this thread from an e-mail address that the mailing list seems not to recognize)</font></tt><br>
<br>
<tt><font size="2"><br>
> From: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc@google.com><br>
> Date: 13 May 2015 at 12:34<br>
> Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX vs -fopenmp<br>
> and clang search library search path<br>
> To: David Chisnall <David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk>, "Peyton, Jonathan L" <<br>
> jonathan.l.peyton@intel.com><br>
> Cc: "openmp-dev@dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu" <openmp-dev@dcs-<br>
> maillist2.engr.illinois.edu>, cfe-dev <cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu><br>
> <br>
</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> My suggestion had been 'libllomp' which would be '-lllomp'. But I <br>
> don't really care.</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:32 AM David Chisnall <David.Chisnall@cl.cam.ac.uk<br>
> > wrote:</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> On 13 May 2015, at 17:29, Peyton, Jonathan L <jonathan.l.peyton@intel.com<br>
> > wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > What name is desirable instead of iomp? Do we want to link via…<br>
> > -lllvmomp<br>
> > -llvmomp<br>
> > -lclomp<br>
> > -lcomp<br>
> > -lnotintelomp ( just kidding J )<br>
> > … Some other name? I get the feeling someone outside of Intel <br>
> should make this choice.<br>
> <br>
> [Joining in the bikeshed]<br>
> -llomp seems most consistent (first letter of LLVM + omp, consistent<br>
> with first letter of GNU + omp, first letter of Intel + omp).<br>
> <br>
> David<br>
</font></tt><br>
<tt><font size="2">> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> cfe-dev mailing list<br>
> cfe-dev@cs.uiuc.edu<br>
> <a href="http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev">http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev</a><br>
</font></tt></body></html>