[Openmp-dev] KMP_IOMP_NAME

Jack Howarth howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com
Tue Jun 2 14:22:30 PDT 2015


On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Peyton, Jonathan L
<jonathan.l.peyton at intel.com> wrote:
> I've been burned on this before.  When editing the en_US.txt message catalog file, you can't delete lines because of the way some data structures and enum's are generated (see the generated files kmp_i18n_default.inc and kmp_i18n_id.inc after you build).  You have to put OBSOLETE in place of the name.  So I could do:
>
> OBSOLETE          "You may want to use an %1$s library that supports %2$s interface with version %3$s."
> and
> OBSOLETE          "You may want to use an %1$s library with version %2$s."

Jonathan,
      Might as well mark them as OBSOLETE so that they will get purged
on the next library version change.
                  Jack

>
> -- Johnny
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Howarth [mailto:howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 2:00 PM
> To: Churbanov, Andrey
> Cc: Peyton, Jonathan L; openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
> Subject: Re: [Openmp-dev] KMP_IOMP_NAME
>
> Jonathan,
>       It appears that...
>
> GetNewerIOMPLibrary          "You may want to use an %1$s library that
> supports %2$s interface with version %3$s."
>
> and
>
> GetNewerIRMLLibrary          "You may want to use an %1$s library with
> version %2$s."
>
> are dead code in runtime/src/i18n/en_US.txt and can be removed as well.
>          Jack
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth.mailing.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Andrey,
>>      I've been wondering how much dead-code got dragged in with the
>> bulk merge of the openmp tree (since there really wasn't the normal
>> code-review during that process). Perhaps just as important as adding
>> more OpenMP 4.x support would be going through the openmp codebase and
>> making sure dead legacy code from earlier versions of iomp has been
>> purged out.
>>           Jack
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Churbanov, Andrey
>> <Andrey.Churbanov at intel.com> wrote:
>>> I think it is better to remove unused things rather than rename.
>>>
>>> - Andrey
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: openmp-dev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:openmp-dev-
>>>> bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Jack Howarth
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 7:08 PM
>>>> To: Peyton, Jonathan L; openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
>>>> Subject: [Openmp-dev] KMP_IOMP_NAME
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan,
>>>>       What is the definition of...
>>>>
>>>> #define KMP_IOMP_NAME       "Intel(R) OMP"
>>>>
>>>> in runtime/src/kmp.h used for? I don't see any usages within the
>>>> current openmp and cfe sources. If it needs to be retained, should't it be transformed into...
>>>>
>>>> #define KMP_OMP_NAME       "LLVM* OMP"
>>>>
>>>>        Jack
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openmp-dev mailing list
>>>> Openmp-dev at dcs-maillist2.engr.illinois.edu
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/openmp-dev
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Closed Joint Stock Company Intel A/O
>>> Registered legal address: Krylatsky Hills Business Park,
>>> 17 Krylatskaya Str., Bldg 4, Moscow 121614, Russian Federation
>>>
>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>




More information about the Openmp-dev mailing list