[Openmp-dev] [PATCH] [Revisedx2] Initial cmake support

[Andrey Bokhanko]

Alp,

With all respect, a few of assertions you made are simply *not true*.

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:

> It should be made clear that the current OpenMP runtime CMake build system
> has been in development for some time, including on-list discussions in the
> LLVM community that go back weeks following all the best practices we have.
> The only thing that changed is that C. Bergstrom graciously provided the
> sign-off we needed to integrate Jack's work late last week.
>

What "discussions... that go back weeks" you are speaking about?!

Jack started his "On Improving the Build System revisited" thread on May
30. This is four days ago, not weeks.

And since when "all the best practices" include introducing a new build
system without getting project architect's consent? -- especially after
explicitly asked to do so, a message that you conveniently ignored.


> So it's a mischaracterisation to say this happened over the weekend. Even
> if it did that would be on the long side compared to timescales seen on
> llvm-commits.


What timescales you are speaking about?!

For reference, we wait for *weeks* for our OpenMP in clang patches to be
reviewed! And we commit them *only* after explicit consent of one of clang
code owners -- even if we already got code review from someone else.


> In general it's a good idea to participate in on-list discussions and give
> a heads up if you see people discussing features you have plans for. Is
> there anything else in the pipeline?


That's *exactly* what we did back in March.

http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/openmp-dev/2014-March/000055.html

Yours,
Andrey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/openmp-dev/attachments/20140602/4394aa55/attachment.html>