[Openmp-commits] [PATCH] D117627: [OpenMP] Introduce an environment variable to disable atomic map clauses

Shilei Tian via Phabricator via Openmp-commits openmp-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 19 08:07:40 PST 2022


tianshilei1992 added inline comments.


================
Comment at: openmp/docs/design/Runtimes.rst:1015
+consequence, users have to guarantee themselves that no two map clauses will
+concurrently map the same memory. If the memory is already mapped and the
+map clauses will only modify the reference counter from a non-zero count to
----------------
jdoerfert wrote:
> tianshilei1992 wrote:
> > Probably better to mention no matter implicitly or explicitly.
> I don't get that. What to mention and how?
"As a consequence, users have to guarantee themselves that no two data mappings of same memory, explicitly through `map` clause or implicitly applied by compiler, will concurrently happen."


================
Comment at: openmp/docs/design/Runtimes.rst:686
     * ``LIBOMPTARGET_SHARED_MEMORY_SIZE=<Num>``
+    * ``LIBOMPTARGET_MAP_FORCE_ATOMIC=[no, off, 0] (default on)``
 
----------------
ye-luo wrote:
> OpenMP spec use true/false, TRUE/FALSE. So better to keep the same convention. Values other than these four values should error out.
`libomp` supports all of them. Better to align with them.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D117627/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D117627



More information about the Openmp-commits mailing list