[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][intrange] Fix `arith.shl` inference in case of overflow (PR #91737)

Felix Schneider llvmlistbot at llvm.org
Fri May 10 09:17:46 PDT 2024


ubfx wrote:

> ... wait, hold on, does that use of SExtValue()/ZExtValue() cause problems with, say, `i128`?

True, that might be a problem. I'll look into it.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91737


More information about the Mlir-commits mailing list