[Mlir-commits] [lldb] [llvm] [mlir] Split the llvm::ThreadPool into an abstract base class and an implementation (PR #82094)

[Alexandre Ganea]

================
@@ -227,7 +265,7 @@ class ThreadPool {
 class ThreadPoolTaskGroup {
----------------
aganea wrote:

Wouldn't the implemention for `ThreadPoolTaskGroup` come in hand with the one for `ThreadPool`? I feel if someone implements the `ThreadPoolInterface` they would want something similar for the groups? The use case is like I said: the new implementation would want to store something in the `ThreadPoolTaskGroup`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82094