[Mlir-commits] [mlir] [mlir][ArmSME] Add support for lowering masked tile_load ops (PR #70915)

[Andrzej Warzyński]

================
@@ -142,6 +141,245 @@ struct TileLoadOpConversion : public OpRewritePattern<arm_sme::TileLoadOp> {
   }
 };
 
+/// Lower `arm_sme.tile_load` with mask and pad of constant zero.
+///
+///  BEFORE:
+///  ```mlir
+///  %pad = arith.constant 0 : i32
+///  %num_rows = arith.constant 2 : index
+///  %num_cols = arith.constant 4 : index
+///  %mask = vector.create_mask %num_rows, %num_cols : vector<[4]x[4]xi1>
+///  %tile = arm_sme.tile_load %src[%c0, %c0], %pad, %mask :
+///    memref<?x?xi32>, vector<[4]x[4]xi32>
+///  ```
+///
+///  AFTER:
+///  ```mlir
+///  %c0 = arith.constant 0 : index
+///  %c1 = arith.constant 1 : index
+///  %tile = arm_sme.zero : vector<[4]x[4]xi32>
+///  %num_cols = vector.create_mask %c4 : vector<[4]xi1>
+///  scf.for %tile_slice_idx = %c0 to %num_rows step %c1 {
+///    %tile_update = arm_sme.load_tile_slice
+///      %src[%tile_slice_idx], %num_cols, %tile, %tile_slice_idx :
+///      memref<?x?xi32>, vector<[1]xi32>, vector<[4]x[4]xi32>
+///  }
+///  ```
+///
+/// NOTE: Only mask of 'vector.create_mask' op is currently supported.
+struct TileLoadOpWithMaskAndPadZeroConversion
+    : public OpRewritePattern<arm_sme::TileLoadOp> {
+  using OpRewritePattern<arm_sme::TileLoadOp>::OpRewritePattern;
+
+  LogicalResult matchAndRewrite(arm_sme::TileLoadOp tileLoadOp,
+                                PatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+    OpBuilder::InsertionGuard g(rewriter);
+    auto loc = tileLoadOp.getLoc();
+    auto tileType = tileLoadOp.getVectorType();
+
+    auto maskOp = tileLoadOp.getMask();
+    if (!maskOp)
+      return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+          tileLoadOp, "op has no mask, needs unmasked pattern");
+
+    auto padOp = tileLoadOp.getPadding();
+    assert(padOp && "expected padding when masking!");
+
+    auto createMaskOp = maskOp.getDefiningOp<vector::CreateMaskOp>();
+    if (!createMaskOp)
+      return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+          tileLoadOp, "unsupported mask op, only 'vector.create_mask' is "
+                      "currently supported");
+
+    auto constPadOp = padOp.getDefiningOp<arith::ConstantOp>();
+    if (!constPadOp || constPadOp.getValue() !=
+                           rewriter.getZeroAttr(tileType.getElementType()))
+      return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+          tileLoadOp, "op has non-zero pad, needs non-zero pad pattern");
+
+    auto numRows = createMaskOp.getOperands()[0];
+    auto numCols = createMaskOp.getOperands()[1];
+
+    auto predicateType =
+        VectorType::get(tileType.getDimSize(1), rewriter.getI1Type(), true);
+    auto numColsOp =
+        rewriter.create<vector::CreateMaskOp>(loc, predicateType, numCols);
+
+    // Initialize tile with zero to satisfy padding. Inactive cols will be
+    // zeroed anyway since the loads use zeroing predication. For inactive rows
+    // however, no load will occur so these need to be zeroed.
+    auto tile = rewriter.create<arm_sme::ZeroOp>(loc, tileType);
+
+    // Create a loop to load the active tile slices from memory.
+    auto step = rewriter.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 1);
+    auto lowerBound = rewriter.create<arith::ConstantIndexOp>(loc, 0);
+    auto upperBound = numRows;
+    auto forOp = rewriter.create<scf::ForOp>(loc, lowerBound, upperBound, step);
+
+    rewriter.setInsertionPointToStart(forOp.getBody());
+
+    // Create 'arm_sme.load_tile_slice' to load tile slice from memory into
+    // tile.
+    SmallVector<Value> memrefIndices;
+    auto tileSliceIndex = forOp.getInductionVar();
+    getMemrefIndices(tileLoadOp.getIndices(),
+                     tileLoadOp.getMemRefType().getRank(), tileSliceIndex,
+                     upperBound, memrefIndices, loc, rewriter);
+    rewriter.create<arm_sme::LoadTileSliceOp>(
+        loc, tileType, tileLoadOp.getBase(), numColsOp, tile, memrefIndices,
+        tileSliceIndex, tileLoadOp.getLayout());
+
+    rewriter.setInsertionPointAfter(forOp);
+
+    // Replace 'arm_sme.tile_load' with the tile.
+    rewriter.replaceOp(tileLoadOp, tile);
+
+    return success();
+  }
+};
+
+/// Lower `arm_sme.tile_load` with mask and non-zero pad.
+///
+///  BEFORE:
+///  ```mlir
+///  %pad = arith.constant 1 : i32
+///  %num_rows = arith.constant 2 : index
+///  %num_cols = arith.constant 4 : index
+///  %mask = vector.create_mask %num_rows, %num_cols : vector<[4]x[4]xi1>
+///  %tile = arm_sme.tile_load %src[%c0, %c0], %pad, %mask :
+///    memref<?x?xi32>, vector<[4]x[4]xi32>
+///  ```
+///
+///  AFTER:
+///  ```mlir
+///  %pad_1d = arith.constant dense<1> : vector<[4]xi32>
+///  %num_rows = arith.constant 2 : index
+///  %num_cols = arith.constant 4 : index
+///  %num_cols_i32 = arith.index_castui %num_cols : index to i32
+///  %tile_id = arm_sme.get_tile_id : i32
+///  %tile = arm_sme.cast_tile_to_vector %tile_id : i32 to vector<[4]x[4]xi32>
+///  %vscale = vector.vscale
+///  %c0 = arith.constant 0 : index
+///  %c1 = arith.constant 1 : index
+///  %min_svl_s = arith.constant 4 : index
+///  %svl_s = arith.muli %min_svl_s, %vscale : index
+///  scf.for %tile_slice_idx = %c0 to %svl_s step %c1 {
+///    %row_is_active = arith.cmpi ult %tile_slice_idx, %num_rows : index
+///    %row_is_active_i32 = arith.extsi %row_is_active : i1 to i32
+///    %mask = arith.andi %row_is_active_i32, %num_cols_i32 : i32
+///    %mask_index = arith.index_cast %mask : i32 to index
+///    %mask_1d = vector.create_mask %mask_index : vector<[4]xi1>
+///    %slice = vector.maskedload %base[%tile_slice_idx, %c0], %mask_1d, %pad
+///      : memref<?x?xi32>, vector<[4]xi1>,
+///        vector<[4]xi32> into vector<[4]xi32>
+///    // Insert slice into tile
+///    arm_sme.move_vector_to_tile_slice %slice, %tile, %tile_slice_idx
+///      : vector<[4]xi32> into vector<[4]x[4]xi32>
+///  }
+///  ```
+struct TileLoadOpWithMaskAndPadNonZeroConversion
+    : public OpRewritePattern<arm_sme::TileLoadOp> {
+  using OpRewritePattern<arm_sme::TileLoadOp>::OpRewritePattern;
+
+  LogicalResult matchAndRewrite(arm_sme::TileLoadOp tileLoadOp,
+                                PatternRewriter &rewriter) const override {
+    OpBuilder::InsertionGuard g(rewriter);
+    auto loc = tileLoadOp.getLoc();
+    auto tileType = tileLoadOp.getVectorType();
+    auto tileElementType = tileType.getElementType();
+    unsigned tileElementWidth = tileElementType.getIntOrFloatBitWidth();
+
+    auto maskOp = tileLoadOp.getMask();
+    if (!maskOp)
+      return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+          tileLoadOp, "op has no mask, needs unmasked pattern");
+
+    auto padOp = tileLoadOp.getPadding();
+    assert(padOp && "expected padding when masking!");
+
+    auto createMaskOp = maskOp.getDefiningOp<vector::CreateMaskOp>();
+    if (!createMaskOp)
+      return rewriter.notifyMatchFailure(
+          tileLoadOp, "unsupported mask op, only 'vector.create_mask' is "
+                      "currently supported");
----------------
banach-space wrote:

Do we need a test for this?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70915