[llvm-testresults] pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Sun Jan 19 09:50:07 PST 2014


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20827?compare_to=20826&baseline=19898
Nickname: pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:34

Comparing:
     Run: 20827, Order: 199596, Start Time: 2014-01-19 13:13:11, End Time: 2014-01-19 17:55:02
      To: 20826, Order: 199595, Start Time: 2014-01-19 13:07:44, End Time: 2014-01-19 17:52:03
Baseline: 19898, Order: 198654, Start Time: 2014-01-07 01:21:49, End Time: 2014-01-07 06:07:29

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 11 (25 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (5 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1099 (1080 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-07-10-SignConversions: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ConditionalExpr: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/objinst: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/atax/atax: 29.41% (0.0680 => 0.0880, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/15-trie/trie: 18.75% (0.0640 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0027)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/deriv1/deriv1: 8.33% (0.2400 => 0.2600, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort: 4.92% (0.2440 => 0.2560, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 1.86% (1.7200 => 1.7520, std.dev.: 0.0122)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 26.32% (0.0760 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 10.71% (0.1120 => 0.1240, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib: 8.96% (0.2680 => 0.2920, std.dev.: 0.0089)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ConditionalExpr: 75.00% (0.0160 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/nestedloop: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/SignlessTypes/shr: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/objinst: 30.00% (0.0400 => 0.0520, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/medley/reg_detect/reg_detect: 15.15% (0.1320 => 0.1520, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: 4.82% (0.6640 => 0.6960, std.dev.: 0.0090)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl: 3.37% (1.1881 => 1.2281, std.dev.: 0.0103)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso: 2.59% (6.0160 => 6.1720, std.dev.: 0.0265)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 2.58% (1.7080 => 1.7520, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: 2.53% (0.9480 => 0.9720, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: 2.32% (1.2081 => 1.2361, std.dev.: 0.0088)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDataFlow-flt: 1.95% (1.2281 => 1.2521, std.dev.: 0.0082)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc: 1.83% (10.6960 => 10.8920, std.dev.: 0.0551)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg: 1.72% (5.8000 => 5.9000, std.dev.: 0.0209)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-dbl/Reductions-dbl: 1.59% (1.2601 => 1.2801, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: 1.43% (1.9640 => 1.9920, std.dev.: 0.0108)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-flt/Expansion-flt: 1.28% (1.2481 => 1.2641, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: 1.15% (10.4082 => 10.5282, std.dev.: 0.0428)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 1.09% (17.6165 => 17.8085, std.dev.: 0.0441)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 20.00% (0.0800 => 0.0960, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd: 16.07% (0.2240 => 0.2600, std.dev.: 0.0057)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst: 14.81% (0.1080 => 0.1240, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/perimeter/perimeter: 7.89% (0.3040 => 0.3280, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/Large/fasta: 3.75% (0.9601 => 0.9961, std.dev.: 0.0109)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ft/ft: 1.50% (1.0641 => 1.0801, std.dev.: 0.0037)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-2: -40.00% (0.0400 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0057)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -16.90% (0.2840 => 0.2360, std.dev.: 0.0030)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: -4.35% (2.3881 => 2.2841, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl: -1.79% (4.2563 => 4.1803, std.dev.: 0.0028)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: -1.08% (4.0643 => 4.0203, std.dev.: 0.0149)

Report Time: 1.98s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140119/29ae519e/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list