[llvm-testresults] pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Fri Jan 17 10:55:40 PST 2014


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20732?compare_to=20731&baseline=19898
Nickname: pollyperf-O3__clang_DEV__x86_64:34

Comparing:
     Run: 20732, Order: 199491, Start Time: 2014-01-17 14:18:24, End Time: 2014-01-17 19:00:33
      To: 20731, Order: 199490, Start Time: 2014-01-17 13:30:03, End Time: 2014-01-17 18:13:51
Baseline: 19898, Order: 198654, Start Time: 2014-01-07 01:21:49, End Time: 2014-01-07 06:07:29

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 10 (25 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 1 (3 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1099 (1082 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/treeadd/treeadd: 40.00% (0.0400 => 0.0560, std.dev.: 0.0042)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/NPB-serial/is/is: 18.75% (0.0640 => 0.0760, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: 13.64% (0.0880 => 0.1000, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/g721/g721encode/encode: 10.71% (0.2240 => 0.2480, std.dev.: 0.0084)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray: 3.30% (0.3640 => 0.3760, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 2.42% (1.1561 => 1.1841, std.dev.: 0.0092)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 15.38% (0.1040 => 0.1200, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 2.00% (0.6000 => 0.6120, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 1.04% (2.3081 => 2.3321, std.dev.: 0.0074)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: -28.57% (0.0840 => 0.0600, std.dev.: 0.0084)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 400.00% (0.0040 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-10-13-SwitchTest: 300.00% (0.0040 => 0.0160, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/dead_try_block: 150.00% (0.0080 => 0.0200, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  SingleSource/Regression/C++/fixups: 133.33% (0.0120 => 0.0280, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0039)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/simple: 100.00% (0.0120 => 0.0240, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-adpcm/telecomm-adpcm: 36.36% (0.0440 => 0.0600, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syrk/syrk: 16.67% (0.0720 => 0.0840, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat: 8.77% (0.2280 => 0.2480, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/ReedSolomon: 5.66% (0.2120 => 0.2240, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists: 5.48% (0.2920 => 0.3080, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 5.05% (0.3960 => 0.4160, std.dev.: 0.0061)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/ray: 3.30% (0.3640 => 0.3760, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/InductionVariable-dbl/InductionVariable-dbl: 3.03% (1.1881 => 1.2241, std.dev.: 0.0070)
  MultiSource/Applications/ALAC/decode/alacconvert-decode: 2.69% (1.1880 => 1.2200, std.dev.: 0.0102)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 2.07% (1.1601 => 1.1841, std.dev.: 0.0092)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg: 2.00% (5.8000 => 5.9160, std.dev.: 0.0364)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: 1.99% (1.2081 => 1.2321, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 1.77% (8.1441 => 8.2881, std.dev.: 0.0304)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 1.70% (1.1761 => 1.1961, std.dev.: 0.0075)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 1.42% (4.5200 => 4.5840, std.dev.: 0.0215)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet: 1.19% (37.0925 => 37.5326, std.dev.: 0.0761)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: 50.00% (0.0240 => 0.0360, std.dev.: 0.0045)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor: 25.00% (0.0800 => 0.1000, std.dev.: 0.0044)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 2.00% (0.6000 => 0.6120, std.dev.: 0.0043)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -16.90% (0.2840 => 0.2360, std.dev.: 0.0020)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-flt/Symbolics-flt: -4.52% (2.3881 => 2.2801, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Symbolics-dbl/Symbolics-dbl: -1.69% (4.2563 => 4.1843, std.dev.: 0.0024)

Report Time: 1.84s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140117/cf129242/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list