[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Wed Jan 8 04:04:21 PST 2014


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/20018?compare_to=20008&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 20018, Order: 198743, Start Time: 2014-01-08 10:09:30, End Time: 2014-01-08 12:09:06
      To: 20008, Order: 198739, Start Time: 2014-01-08 07:53:08, End Time: 2014-01-08 09:46:19
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 15 (15 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 2 (9 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1093 (1086 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: 55.04% (1.3323 => 2.0656, std.dev.: 0.0657)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/objects/objects: 47.79% (0.0950 => 0.1404, std.dev.: 0.0100)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office: 44.76% (0.2158 => 0.3124, std.dev.: 0.0282)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes: 26.75% (0.2991 => 0.3791, std.dev.: 0.0265)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 2.75% (1.3395 => 1.3763, std.dev.: 0.0129)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: 27.64% (0.1545 => 0.1972, std.dev.: 0.0013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: 14.77% (4.5370 => 5.2069, std.dev.: 0.1164)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 6.65% (1.3692 => 1.4602, std.dev.: 0.0235)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: 5.95% (6.4218 => 6.8038, std.dev.: 0.1188)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: 5.57% (3.8155 => 4.0281, std.dev.: 0.0101)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 5.04% (4.5745 => 4.8050, std.dev.: 0.0759)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: 4.31% (45.2176 => 47.1643, std.dev.: 0.6072)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: 2.44% (3.3664 => 3.4484, std.dev.: 0.0235)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: 1.34% (16.5430 => 16.7639, std.dev.: 0.0324)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/matmul_f64_4x4: 1.06% (1.4954 => 1.5112, std.dev.: 0.0058)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: -2.75% (5.9803 => 5.8157, std.dev.: 0.0184)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/jacobi-2d-imper/jacobi-2d-imper: -2.01% (1.6088 => 1.5764, std.dev.: 0.0085)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: 50.75% (1.3702 => 2.0656, std.dev.: 0.0657)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/objects/objects: 46.40% (0.0959 => 0.1404, std.dev.: 0.0100)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office: 43.50% (0.2177 => 0.3124, std.dev.: 0.0282)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 18.61% (5.9583 => 7.0671, std.dev.: 0.0856)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/em3d/em3d: 12.89% (4.6123 => 5.2069, std.dev.: 0.1164)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 12.40% (82.2592 => 92.4621, std.dev.: 0.5544)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 7.94% (3.3810 => 3.6495, std.dev.: 0.0637)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks: 5.52% (1.3838 => 1.4602, std.dev.: 0.0235)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 5.36% (3.4258 => 3.6093, std.dev.: 0.0636)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.72% (4.5883 => 4.8050, std.dev.: 0.0759)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 3.12% (4.1840 => 4.3145, std.dev.: 0.0361)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/cholesky/cholesky: 1.90% (1.4366 => 1.4639, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 1.82% (11.7894 => 12.0041, std.dev.: 0.0169)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 1.45% (2.8130 => 2.8539, std.dev.: 0.0110)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 1.42% (3.5960 => 3.6469, std.dev.: 0.0031)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3: -24.85% (0.0688 => 0.0517, std.dev.: 0.0013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: -3.98% (1.3505 => 1.2968, std.dev.: 0.0110)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl: -2.56% (1.4125 => 1.3764, std.dev.: 0.0089)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: -2.48% (1.4113 => 1.3763, std.dev.: 0.0129)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode: -17.10% (0.1035 => 0.0858, std.dev.: 0.0048)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -16.00% (15.5356 => 13.0506, std.dev.: 0.4402)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -7.46% (50.9650 => 47.1643, std.dev.: 0.6072)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: -3.93% (6.0535 => 5.8157, std.dev.: 0.0184)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/doitgen/doitgen: -3.03% (3.6583 => 3.5474, std.dev.: 0.0297)

Report Time: 0.84s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140108/f5f90293/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list