[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/19838?compare_to=19829&baseline=17660
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:21

Comparing:
     Run: 19838, Order: 198597, Start Time: 2014-01-06 12:04:26, End Time: 2014-01-06 13:50:55
      To: 19829, Order: 198593, Start Time: 2014-01-06 09:45:34, End Time: 2014-01-06 11:26:16
Baseline: 17660, Order: 195884, Start Time: 2013-11-27 22:43:57, End Time: 2013-11-28 00:31:03

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 16 (27 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 4 (15 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1090 (1068 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1110

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls: 62.77% (0.0419 => 0.0682, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/whetstone: 58.82% (0.0901 => 0.1431, std.dev.: 0.0099)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 16.67% (0.0702 => 0.0819, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 5.46% (0.2471 => 0.2606, std.dev.: 0.0000)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 3.72% (0.8302 => 0.8611, std.dev.: 0.0009)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort: 35.93% (2.8125 => 3.8231, std.dev.: 0.3133)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 30.63% (2.9498 => 3.8533, std.dev.: 0.2987)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 15.75% (2.3833 => 2.7586, std.dev.: 0.0681)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/spectral-norm: 12.76% (2.1031 => 2.3715, std.dev.: 0.0127)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 8.36% (7.4985 => 8.1256, std.dev.: 0.1572)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 7.28% (1.1093 => 1.1901, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 4.89% (29.5220 => 30.9663, std.dev.: 0.1067)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.75% (4.5658 => 4.7828, std.dev.: 0.0102)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/lists1: 4.35% (0.5675 => 0.5922, std.dev.: 0.0079)
  MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod: 3.52% (7.7286 => 8.0008, std.dev.: 0.0289)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 2.04% (7.7218 => 7.8790, std.dev.: 0.0149)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: -28.79% (4.0252 => 2.8662, std.dev.: 0.0139)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: -13.97% (2.1108 => 1.8159, std.dev.: 0.0024)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -2.42% (3.8275 => 3.7347, std.dev.: 0.0018)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-dbl/Reductions-dbl: -1.72% (12.1386 => 11.9299, std.dev.: 0.0695)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/whetstone: 60.25% (0.0893 => 0.1431, std.dev.: 0.0099)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-11-Popcount-ffs-fls: 60.09% (0.0426 => 0.0682, std.dev.: 0.0060)
  MultiSource/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3: 41.30% (15.7419 => 22.2431, std.dev.: 1.0342)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/compiler/compiler: 28.19% (0.3859 => 0.4947, std.dev.: 0.0213)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary: 5.00% (0.2482 => 0.2606, std.dev.: 0.0000)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 4.71% (0.8224 => 0.8611, std.dev.: 0.0009)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: 30.66% (2.9492 => 3.8533, std.dev.: 0.2987)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/heapsort: 27.67% (2.9945 => 3.8231, std.dev.: 0.3133)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 17.01% (5.9583 => 6.9717, std.dev.: 0.1397)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/spectral-norm: 12.82% (2.1020 => 2.3715, std.dev.: 0.0127)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: 12.02% (82.2592 => 92.1434, std.dev.: 0.2588)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/chomp: 9.12% (1.0099 => 1.1020, std.dev.: 0.0137)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc: 8.00% (1.1019 => 1.1901, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: 7.93% (2.5559 => 2.7586, std.dev.: 0.0681)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 7.81% (3.3810 => 3.6450, std.dev.: 0.0560)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/salsa20: 6.99% (7.5947 => 8.1256, std.dev.: 0.1572)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 6.28% (29.1357 => 30.9663, std.dev.: 0.1067)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 5.81% (6.9930 => 7.3994, std.dev.: 0.0789)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.24% (4.5883 => 4.7828, std.dev.: 0.0102)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 3.99% (0.8745 => 0.9094, std.dev.: 0.0043)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 3.10% (1.5986 => 1.6481, std.dev.: 0.0146)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 2.42% (7.6931 => 7.8790, std.dev.: 0.0149)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Reductions-flt/Reductions-flt: 2.23% (11.7894 => 12.0523, std.dev.: 0.0191)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 2.20% (5.5032 => 5.6242, std.dev.: 0.0109)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/fdtd-2d/fdtd-2d: 1.89% (4.4509 => 4.5348, std.dev.: 0.0212)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: 1.22% (2.3882 => 2.4173, std.dev.: 0.0038)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/matrix: 1.11% (1.7960 => 1.8159, std.dev.: 0.0024)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-stringsearch/office-stringsearch: -14.29% (0.1938 => 0.1661, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-md5/enc-md5: -7.38% (0.1774 => 0.1643, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael: -6.35% (0.6882 => 0.6445, std.dev.: 0.0040)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish: -5.79% (0.3402 => 0.3205, std.dev.: 0.0067)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell: -5.52% (2.0207 => 1.9092, std.dev.: 0.0205)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-dbl/LoopRestructuring-dbl: -5.18% (1.3819 => 1.3103, std.dev.: 0.0223)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl: -5.14% (1.4125 => 1.3399, std.dev.: 0.0258)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: -4.98% (1.4113 => 1.3410, std.dev.: 0.0226)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: -4.56% (1.3146 => 1.2546, std.dev.: 0.0203)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl: -3.90% (1.3157 => 1.2644, std.dev.: 0.0182)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/mpeg2/mpeg2dec/mpeg2decode: -44.44% (0.0369 => 0.0205, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -16.61% (15.5356 => 12.9548, std.dev.: 0.1245)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Searching-dbl/Searching-dbl: -8.06% (6.8826 => 6.3277, std.dev.: 0.2035)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-flt/ControlFlow-flt: -6.00% (5.9456 => 5.5887, std.dev.: 0.0481)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k: -2.75% (6.0535 => 5.8872, std.dev.: 0.0598)

Report Time: 1.19s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20140106/65ad7c8f/attachment.html>