[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Sep 26 17:22:25 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/15705?compare_to=15702&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 15705, Order: 191465, Start Time: 2013-09-26 22:35:29, End Time: 2013-09-27 00:25:11
      To: 15702, Order: 191451, Start Time: 2013-09-26 20:24:52, End Time: 2013-09-26 22:12:23
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 7 (19 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 1 (11 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1099 (1077 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve: 20.25% (7.0629 => 8.4933, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 4.50% (7.1882 => 7.5115, std.dev.: 0.0098)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 2.19% (5.5390 => 5.6605, std.dev.: 0.0356)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 1.61% (6.5822 => 6.6883, std.dev.: 0.0123)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/random: 1.23% (2.4485 => 2.4787, std.dev.: 0.0008)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: 1.18% (5.9403 => 6.0102, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 1.15% (3.5791 => 3.6201, std.dev.: 0.0066)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -1.47% (18.7505 => 18.4757, std.dev.: 0.1013)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 1.05% (0.1337 => 0.1351, std.dev.: 0.0158)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/durbin/durbin: 13.02% (0.0799 => 0.0903, std.dev.: 0.0014)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms: 3.52% (0.9494 => 0.9828, std.dev.: 0.0059)
  MultiSource/Applications/ALAC/decode/alacconvert-decode: 3.42% (1.1393 => 1.1783, std.dev.: 0.0091)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/methcall: 63.37% (7.6426 => 12.4855, std.dev.: 0.1013)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: 18.41% (0.1374 => 0.1627, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve: 17.55% (7.2254 => 8.4933, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.62% (0.5561 => 0.5929, std.dev.: 0.0034)
  MultiSource/Applications/lambda-0_1_3/lambda: 6.40% (8.1346 => 8.6554, std.dev.: 0.0544)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv: 5.61% (0.1871 => 0.1976, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/five11/five11: 5.38% (5.3716 => 5.6605, std.dev.: 0.0356)
  MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: 3.92% (14.7810 => 15.3610, std.dev.: 0.1681)
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 2.52% (3.5310 => 3.6201, std.dev.: 0.0066)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 2.16% (2.4920 => 2.5459, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/lists: 1.92% (7.3703 => 7.5115, std.dev.: 0.0098)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: 1.91% (3.8582 => 3.9317, std.dev.: 0.0279)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 1.61% (3.5966 => 3.6545, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.46% (16.7972 => 17.0430, std.dev.: 0.0297)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 1.41% (1.5940 => 1.6165, std.dev.: 0.0073)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-flt/LoopRerolling-flt: 1.29% (6.6028 => 6.6883, std.dev.: 0.0123)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -54.96% (0.5226 => 0.2354, std.dev.: 0.0447)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -47.06% (1.5790 => 0.8359, std.dev.: 0.0331)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -18.57% (15.9508 => 12.9882, std.dev.: 0.3661)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/heapsort: -18.30% (3.5900 => 2.9330, std.dev.: 0.1803)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -17.79% (57.2347 => 47.0509, std.dev.: 1.8628)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -11.28% (20.8247 => 18.4757, std.dev.: 0.1013)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -9.75% (3.4956 => 3.1549, std.dev.: 0.0300)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -6.85% (3.7437 => 3.4871, std.dev.: 0.0891)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -3.75% (4.3592 => 4.1956, std.dev.: 0.0567)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -1.78% (17.1431 => 16.8383, std.dev.: 0.0573)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -1.16% (2.4471 => 2.4188, std.dev.: 0.0029)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 0.22% (0.1348 => 0.1351, std.dev.: 0.0158)

Report Time: 0.65s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130926/117c586b/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list