[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

[llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu]

http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/15614?compare_to=15610&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 15614, Order: 191284, Start Time: 2013-09-24 10:11:16, End Time: 2013-09-24 12:01:05
      To: 15610, Order: 191281, Start Time: 2013-09-24 08:03:10, End Time: 2013-09-24 09:46:43
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 4 (18 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 0 (15 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1103 (1074 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ackermann: 10.31% (3.5466 => 3.9123, std.dev.: 0.0752)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench: 10.22% (3.6877 => 4.0646, std.dev.: 0.0593)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: 6.24% (3.8435 => 4.0834, std.dev.: 0.0869)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 1.53% (1.6111 => 1.6357, std.dev.: 0.0031)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 5.05% (0.1326 => 0.1393, std.dev.: 0.0047)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod: 5.92% (2.4480 => 2.5929, std.dev.: 0.0273)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: 3.82% (0.3848 => 0.3995, std.dev.: 0.0035)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 3.50% (0.8911 => 0.9223, std.dev.: 0.0086)
  MultiSource/Applications/ALAC/encode/alacconvert-encode: 2.40% (1.1580 => 1.1858, std.dev.: 0.0021)
  MultiSource/Applications/lua/lua: 2.16% (4.2242 => 4.3156, std.dev.: 0.0345)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-flt/Expansion-flt: 2.04% (1.3303 => 1.3575, std.dev.: 0.0058)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: 18.70% (0.1374 => 0.1631, std.dev.: 0.0093)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt: 8.74% (3.5550 => 3.8658, std.dev.: 0.0025)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/sim/sim: 6.58% (3.8312 => 4.0834, std.dev.: 0.0869)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 5.62% (2.8194 => 2.9779, std.dev.: 0.0131)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 5.50% (0.5561 => 0.5867, std.dev.: 0.0032)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/misr: 3.37% (0.3771 => 0.3898, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-flt/Equivalencing-flt: 2.89% (4.0181 => 4.1341, std.dev.: 0.0062)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/stencils/seidel-2d/seidel-2d: 2.62% (1.5940 => 1.6357, std.dev.: 0.0031)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-flt/IndirectAddressing-flt: 2.41% (5.4925 => 5.6249, std.dev.: 0.0364)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 1.88% (1.4528 => 1.4801, std.dev.: 0.0036)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/fib2: 1.58% (3.5966 => 3.6533, std.dev.: 0.0037)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 1.25% (8.5434 => 8.6505, std.dev.: 0.0351)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -21.11% (0.1483 => 0.1170, std.dev.: 0.0003)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/lpbench: -9.29% (0.1195 => 0.1084, std.dev.: 0.0011)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/matrix: -7.55% (0.2571 => 0.2377, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt: -1.37% (1.2499 => 1.2328, std.dev.: 0.0061)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/neural/neural: -54.84% (0.5226 => 0.2360, std.dev.: 0.0265)
  MultiSource/Applications/sgefa/sgefa: -47.10% (1.5790 => 0.8353, std.dev.: 0.0047)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -24.35% (57.2347 => 43.2971, std.dev.: 1.5335)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk: -19.21% (15.9508 => 12.8870, std.dev.: 0.3804)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: -12.55% (20.8247 => 18.2104, std.dev.: 0.2573)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_loop_invariant: -10.32% (3.4956 => 3.1349, std.dev.: 0.0391)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason/mason: -9.93% (0.3304 => 0.2976, std.dev.: 0.0074)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign: -7.98% (50.0284 => 46.0338, std.dev.: 0.1885)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: -3.40% (4.3592 => 4.2109, std.dev.: 0.0482)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -2.41% (2.4471 => 2.3881, std.dev.: 0.0177)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: -1.01% (89.7126 => 88.8054, std.dev.: 0.0758)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: 3.34% (0.1348 => 0.1393, std.dev.: 0.0047)

Report Time: 1.07s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130924/2fd507ce/attachment.html>