[llvm-testresults] chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64 test results

llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu
Thu Sep 12 21:29:55 PDT 2013


http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/15244?compare_to=15241&baseline=15193
Nickname: chinook-clangslave1__O3-plain__clang_DEV__powerpc64:16

Comparing:
     Run: 15244, Order: 190652, Start Time: 2013-09-13 02:44:21, End Time: 2013-09-13 04:32:29
      To: 15241, Order: 190646, Start Time: 2013-09-13 00:33:34, End Time: 2013-09-13 02:21:53
Baseline: 15193, Order: 190525, Start Time: 2013-09-11 14:56:37, End Time: 2013-09-11 16:46:18

===============
Tests Summary
===============

Performance Regressions: 12 (18 on baseline)
Performance Improvements: 1 (7 on baseline)
Existing Failures: 1 (1 on baseline)
Unchanged Tests: 1094 (1082 on baseline)
Total Tests: 1108

===========================
Run-Over-Run Changes Detail
===========================

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: 5.76% (3.5185 => 3.7213, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/EH/except: 5.16% (0.4570 => 0.4806, std.dev.: 0.0023)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.42% (4.5749 => 4.7771, std.dev.: 0.0292)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 3.32% (7.5566 => 7.8077, std.dev.: 0.0366)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: 3.12% (5.8204 => 6.0020, std.dev.: 0.0125)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: 2.10% (2.5286 => 2.5818, std.dev.: 0.0005)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/IndirectAddressing-dbl/IndirectAddressing-dbl: 1.96% (5.2731 => 5.3767, std.dev.: 0.0371)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlFlow-dbl/ControlFlow-dbl: 1.72% (5.8895 => 5.9909, std.dev.: 0.0210)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 1.58% (1.4476 => 1.4704, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 1.55% (6.7181 => 6.8219, std.dev.: 0.0201)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Expansion-dbl/Expansion-dbl: 1.15% (4.9367 => 4.9937, std.dev.: 0.0168)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/Large/fasta: 1.10% (1.3632 => 1.3782, std.dev.: 0.0016)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Puzzle: -9.09% (0.1871 => 0.1701, std.dev.: 0.0059)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -4.44% (0.1350 => 0.1290, std.dev.: 0.0040)

================================
Run-Over-Baseline Changes Detail
================================

Performance Regressions - Compile Time
--------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 1.79% (0.6297 => 0.6410, std.dev.: 0.0022)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Recurrences-dbl/Recurrences-dbl: 1.66% (1.2086 => 1.2287, std.dev.: 0.0052)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: 1.31% (0.8233 => 0.8341, std.dev.: 0.0019)

Performance Regressions - Execution Time
----------------------------------------
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/pifft/pifft: 18.56% (0.1374 => 0.1629, std.dev.: 0.0033)
  MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi: 7.14% (2.1884 => 2.3447, std.dev.: 0.0063)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/multiplies: 6.65% (0.5561 => 0.5931, std.dev.: 0.0089)
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops: 4.67% (20.8247 => 21.7969, std.dev.: 0.1520)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt: 4.43% (4.5744 => 4.7771, std.dev.: 0.0292)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/Equivalencing-dbl/Equivalencing-dbl: 4.41% (3.5642 => 3.7213, std.dev.: 0.0019)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/gramschmidt/gramschmidt: 4.17% (2.3084 => 2.4046, std.dev.: 0.0227)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-dbl/CrossingThresholds-dbl: 3.92% (5.7757 => 6.0020, std.dev.: 0.0125)
  MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff: 3.18% (2.8194 => 2.9091, std.dev.: 0.0337)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/fp-convert: 2.90% (7.5877 => 7.8077, std.dev.: 0.0366)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/ControlLoops-flt/ControlLoops-flt: 2.05% (3.1569 => 3.2216, std.dev.: 0.0122)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac: 1.40% (2.4920 => 2.5268, std.dev.: 0.0081)
  SingleSource/Regression/C/uint64_to_float: 1.21% (1.4528 => 1.4704, std.dev.: 0.0065)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_abstraction: 1.17% (6.7429 => 6.8219, std.dev.: 0.0201)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/SmallPT/smallpt: 1.14% (16.7972 => 16.9887, std.dev.: 0.0642)

Performance Improvements - Compile Time
---------------------------------------
  SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/Altivec/casts: -21.38% (0.1483 => 0.1166, std.dev.: 0.0030)

Performance Improvements - Execution Time
-----------------------------------------
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Linpack/linpack-pc: -14.53% (57.2347 => 48.9192, std.dev.: 2.1317)
  MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4: -7.63% (3.7437 => 3.4580, std.dev.: 0.0535)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes: -2.64% (2.4471 => 2.3824, std.dev.: 0.0186)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-dbl/GlobalDataFlow-dbl: -2.05% (17.1431 => 16.7913, std.dev.: 0.0449)
  MultiSource/Benchmarks/SciMark2-C/scimark2: -1.60% (89.7126 => 88.2771, std.dev.: 0.4530)
  SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects: -1.21% (3.8582 => 3.8114, std.dev.: 0.0180)

Existing Failures - Execution Time
----------------------------------
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan
  MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan: -4.30% (0.1348 => 0.1290, std.dev.: 0.0040)

Report Time: 0.61s
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-testresults/attachments/20130912/06012c1c/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-testresults mailing list